Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/221333
DC FieldValue
dc.titleHDB LIFT UPGRADING PROGRAMME IN SINGAPORE � IMPACT ON SOCIAL CAPITAL
dc.contributor.authorYANG JINGXIU
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-17T03:12:05Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-22T17:35:01Z
dc.date.available2019-09-26T14:14:00Z
dc.date.available2022-04-22T17:35:01Z
dc.date.issued2013-04-17
dc.identifier.citationYANG JINGXIU (2013-04-17). HDB LIFT UPGRADING PROGRAMME IN SINGAPORE � IMPACT ON SOCIAL CAPITAL. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/221333
dc.description.abstractThe main aim of this study is to find out whether residents whose block has undergone the Lift Upgrading Programme (LUP) utilise the new lift to increase their social interactions with other residents and hence benefit in terms of social capital. Social capital refers to the social support and improvements to the social standing that residents gain through knowing others in the estate. The LUP was introduced in 1990 by the Housing and Development Board (HDB) with the main objective of improving the convenience and lifestyle of residents living in public blocks built before 1990, where lift access on every floor was not offered. This is in line with the strategic thrusts set out by the Ministerial Committee on Aging (MCA) to allow aging-in place for the elderly community. The study carried out 240 surveys to compare the level of physical mobility, social interactions and social capital of residents before and after the LUP. Five interviews were done to uncover the reasons behind some of the survey findings, as well as to further substantiate the survey analyses. It was found that the LUP improved residents’ physical mobility, which removed the need for elderly to change their place of residence and risk losing their existing social ties. Although this means that the LUP achieved its objectives, the study discovered that residents’ social capital is inadequate. Few residents initiate to interact with new people in the estate, thus facing lower social support network when neighbours move out of the estates. There is also a lack of social capital in the form of emotional support. These suggest that more policies can be targeted at expanding residents’ social network, increasing the depth of neighbourly ties, and strengthening trust among them. A key limitation of this study was that it could not cover all the factors that may affect social interactions and social capital, such as respondents’ income and nationality, field of employment and social networks they possess outside the estate.
dc.language.isoen
dc.sourcehttps://lib.sde.nus.edu.sg/dspace/handle/sde/2193
dc.subjectReal Estate
dc.subjectRE
dc.subjectAlice Christudason
dc.subject2012/2013 RE
dc.subjectLift Upgrading Programme
dc.subjectSocial capital
dc.subjectSocial interaction
dc.subjectPhysical mobility
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.departmentREAL ESTATE
dc.contributor.supervisorALICE CHRISTUDASON
dc.description.degreeBachelor's
dc.description.degreeconferredBACHELOR OF SCIENCE (REAL ESTATE)
dc.embargo.terms2013-06-06
Appears in Collections:Bachelor's Theses

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Yang JingXiu 2012-2013.pdf585.9 kBAdobe PDF

RESTRICTED

NoneLog In

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.