Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/220700
DC FieldValue
dc.titleCOMMUNITY GARDENS AS VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO OTHER COMMUNITY FACILITIES IN PUBLIC OPEN SPACES
dc.contributor.authorTEO XIN HUI YVONNE
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-29T03:36:01Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-22T17:16:21Z
dc.date.available2019-09-26T14:13:57Z
dc.date.available2022-04-22T17:16:21Z
dc.date.issued2015-05-29
dc.identifier.citationTEO XIN HUI YVONNE (2015-05-29). COMMUNITY GARDENS AS VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO OTHER COMMUNITY FACILITIES IN PUBLIC OPEN SPACES. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/220700
dc.description.abstractCommunity gardens first started in Mayfair Park Estate under the Community in Bloom (CIB) Initiative. This initiative was launched by the National Parks Board (NParks) in May 2005 to foster a gardening culture among the people in Singapore and to transform public open spaces to potentially useful green spaces. The dissertation sought to determine the level of awareness among residents in public housing estates, with regards to community gardens in their neighbourhood. Subsequently, community gardens as successful public open spaces would be analysed. After which, residents’ level of preference for community gardens over the other present-day community facilities such as hard court, fitness corner, playground, would be examined too. These were undertaken with the aim of establishing the feasibility of multi-functional community gardens as a viable alternative to other present-day community facilities in public housing estates in Singapore The methodology included 200 survey respondents from four housing estate with community garden, and interviews with a gardener and a representative from NParks. Several findings and recommendations were presented, in hope of exploring large-scale implementation of community gardens into future public housing typologies. Findings showed that residents were aware of the benefits and shortcomings of community gardens, and that the gardens were successful public open spaces in limited ways. Residents were also supportive of multi-functional community gardens, but were unwilling to be deprived of the variety of community facilities in their neighbourhood. Thereafter, recommendations were proposed in accordance to the findings discussed. Education and outreach activities are important in the short run to ensure that interest in community gardens do not plateau over time. In the long run, multi-functionality can then be explored further in order to maximise usage of open spaces in public areas.
dc.language.isoen
dc.sourcehttps://lib.sde.nus.edu.sg/dspace/handle/sde/3008
dc.subjectReal Estate
dc.subjectRE
dc.subjectWong Khei Mie Grace
dc.subject2014/2015 RE
dc.subjectCommunity Facilities
dc.subjectCommunity Gardens
dc.subjectPublic Open Spaces
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.departmentREAL ESTATE
dc.contributor.supervisorWONG KHEI MIE GRACE
dc.description.degreeBachelor's
dc.description.degreeconferredBACHELOR OF SCIENCE (REAL ESTATE)
dc.embargo.terms2015-06-03
Appears in Collections:Bachelor's Theses

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Teo Xin Hui Yvonne 2014-2015.pdf1.58 MBAdobe PDF

RESTRICTED

NoneLog In

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.