Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/220550
DC FieldValue
dc.titleA COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN GREEN MARK AND NON-GREEN MARK BUILDING
dc.contributor.authorTEO MAYDELINE
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-26T07:12:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-22T17:11:49Z
dc.date.available2019-09-26T14:13:56Z
dc.date.available2022-04-22T17:11:49Z
dc.date.issued2012-06-26
dc.identifier.citationTEO MAYDELINE (2012-06-26). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN GREEN MARK AND NON-GREEN MARK BUILDING. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/220550
dc.description.abstractStudies have shown that the indoor environmental quality (IEQ) of a building does indeed affect the productivity of occupants. Increased productivity can lead to more profit generation than the cost savings from energy efficiency. Therefore, good IEQ is important in an office environment. This report will be aimed at studying the IEQ in both Green Mark and non Green Mark buildings and to identify if a Green Mark building has a better IEQ. IEQ audit will be done on two building spaces- one that has achieved BCA Green Mark Platinum and one without Green Mark certification. The IEQ parameters investigated include air temperature, relative humidity, air velocity, ventilation rate, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, total volatile organic compounds, formaldehyde, ozone, bacteria, fungi, lighting and sound pressure level. Some of the parameters will be taken over a 48h period whereas some will be spot measurements. Site observations from the walkthrough of the offices will be included to provide some insights on some of the findings. The findings show little differences between the parameters of both offices. This is attributed to the lack of points allocated for the IEQ component of the Green Mark Scheme therefore, leading the Green Mark Platinum building to display little or no improvement of IEQ as compared to the non Green Mark building. The report will end with a conclusion on the limitations of this project due to time and resource constraints and recommendation for the increase of weighting placed on IEQ for the Green Mark Scheme.
dc.language.isoen
dc.sourcehttps://lib.sde.nus.edu.sg/dspace/handle/sde/2078
dc.subjectBuilding
dc.subjectProject and Facilities Management
dc.subjectOoi Peng Lim Steven
dc.subject2011/2012 PFM
dc.subjectPFM
dc.subjectCompare
dc.subjectGreenmark
dc.subjectIEQ
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.departmentBUILDING
dc.contributor.supervisorOOI PENG LIM STEVEN
dc.description.degreeBachelor's
dc.description.degreeconferredBACHELOR OF SCIENCE (PROJECT AND FACILITIES MANAGEMENT)
dc.embargo.terms2012-07-01
Appears in Collections:Bachelor's Theses

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Teo Maydeline 2011-2012.pdf1.83 MBAdobe PDF

RESTRICTED

NoneLog In

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.