Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/220033
DC FieldValue
dc.titleNEW WAYS OF INHABITING - FROM A USER PERSPECTIVE
dc.contributor.authorLIU SHUANGYANG
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-15T07:26:17Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-22T15:50:37Z
dc.date.available2019-09-26T14:13:53Z
dc.date.available2022-04-22T15:50:37Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-15
dc.identifier.citationLIU SHUANGYANG (2015-12-15). NEW WAYS OF INHABITING - FROM A USER PERSPECTIVE. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/220033
dc.description.abstract• Investigating from an empirical sense of environmental design, which covered landscape, furniture design, green features, security, access, maintenance, in other words, the research is to help designers to understand the relevancy (validity) of design from a user point of view. • Investigation by means of Empirical and Evidence-based approach. • Research subject is human-beings. For the purpose of this study, focus is female, assuming they are mothers taking care of children and elderly with assistance. • Based on a questionnaire derived from literature reviews especially healthrelated and architecture theories. 40 questionnaires have been collected over the period of 30 days at different hours and at different days of the week. • The founding are extremely interesting and informative because the subject evaluation and responses from users provide useful database to explain the theories. For instance, spatial visual connection, interaction of physical perceptions, senses and spiritual and spatial designs. • The 40 questionnaires covered 12 specific locations classifies into 2 categories by the author. • By the two categories, the first category “formal space” refers to those spaces that have predominant functions (purposes/activities) such as swimming pool or children playground with specific furniture, or a specific area with equipment for exercises. • Another category as “informal spaces” refers to those areas that have no definite and specific functions such as the ground floor lobby with a big covered open space with chairs and seating, and connection with adjacent spaces like a central plaza. Another example is a space corridor out of a main circulation spine that connects various residential towers. In both examples, the lobby and the verandah turn out to be an active social space, or a place, welcomed by residents, by accident instead of by (design) choice.
dc.language.isoen
dc.sourcehttps://lib.sde.nus.edu.sg/dspace/handle/sde/3258
dc.subjectArchitecture
dc.subjectDesign Technology and Sustainability
dc.subjectDTS
dc.subjectMaster (Architecture)
dc.subjectStephen Lau Siu-yu
dc.subject2015/2016 Aki DTS
dc.subjectEvidence-based approach
dc.subjectEnvironmental design
dc.subjectFeelings
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFormal space
dc.subjectFunctions
dc.subjectHealing environment
dc.subjectHuman-centered
dc.subjectHuman-centric
dc.subjectInformal space
dc.subjectKent Vale
dc.subjectLiving environment
dc.subjectPhysical stimuli
dc.subjectRelationship
dc.subjectUser perception
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.departmentARCHITECTURE
dc.contributor.supervisorSTEPHEN LAU SIU-YU
dc.description.degreeMaster's
dc.description.degreeconferredMASTER OF ARCHITECTURE (M.ARCH)
dc.embargo.terms2015-12-24
Appears in Collections:Master's Theses (Restricted)

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Liushuangyang2015-2016.pdf40.53 MBAdobe PDF

RESTRICTED

NoneLog In

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.