Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx419
Title: Randomized controlled trial of S-1 versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (East Asia S-1 Trial in Lung Cancer)
Authors: Nokihara, H
Lu, S
Mok, TSK
Nakagawa, K
Yamamoto, N
Shi, YK
Zhang, L
Soo, RA 
Yang, JC
Sugawara, S
Nishio, M
Takahashi, T
Goto, K
Chang, J
Maemondo, M
Ichinose, Y
Cheng, Y
Lim, WT 
Morita, S
Tamura, T
Keywords: Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Oncology
docetaxel
non-inferiority
previously treated NSCLC
S-1
phase 3 study
PHASE-3
Issue Date: 1-Nov-2017
Publisher: OXFORD UNIV PRESS
Citation: Nokihara, H, Lu, S, Mok, TSK, Nakagawa, K, Yamamoto, N, Shi, YK, Zhang, L, Soo, RA, Yang, JC, Sugawara, S, Nishio, M, Takahashi, T, Goto, K, Chang, J, Maemondo, M, Ichinose, Y, Cheng, Y, Lim, WT, Morita, S, Tamura, T (2017-11-01). Randomized controlled trial of S-1 versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (East Asia S-1 Trial in Lung Cancer). ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY 28 (11) : 2698-2706. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx419
Abstract: Background: Chemotherapy remains a viable option for the management of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) despite recent advances in molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy. We evaluated the efficacy of oral 5-fluorouracilbased S-1 as second- or third-line therapy compared with standard docetaxel therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Patients and methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with≥1 platinum-based therapy were randomized 1: 1 to docetaxel (60 mg/m2 in Japan, 75 mg/m2 at all other study sites; day 1 in a 3-week cycle) or S-1 (80-120 mg/day, depending on body surface area; days 1-28 in a 6-week cycle). The primary endpoint was overall survival. The non-inferiority margin was a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.2. Results: A total of 1154 patients (577 in each arm) were enrolled, with balanced patient characteristics between the two arms. Median overall survival was 12.75 and 12.52 months in the S-1 and docetaxel arms, respectively [HR 0.945; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.833-1.073; P=0.3818]. The upper limit of 95% CI of HR fell below 1.2, confirming non-inferiority of S-1 to docetaxel. Difference in progression-free survival between treatments was not significant (HR 1.033; 95% CI 0.913-1.168; P=0.6080). Response rate was 8.3% and 9.9% in the S-1 and docetaxel arms, respectively. Significant improvement was observed in the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status over time points in the S-1 arm. The most common adverse drug reactions were decreased appetite (50.4%), nausea (36.4%), and diarrhea (35.9%) in the S-1 arm, and neutropenia (54.8%), leukocytopenia (43.9%), and alopecia (46.6%) in the docetaxel arm. Conclusion: S-1 is equally as efficacious as docetaxel and offers a treatment option for patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC.
Source Title: ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/218598
ISSN: 09237534
15698041
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx419
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Randomized controlled trial of S-1 versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with plat.pdf573.58 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

67
checked on May 28, 2023

Page view(s)

114
checked on May 25, 2023

Download(s)

2
checked on May 25, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.