Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: A Global Survey on the Impact of COVID-19 on Urological Services
Authors: Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun
Ong, William Lay Keat
Gonzalez-Padilla, Daniel
Castellani, Daniele
Dubin, Justin M
Esperto, Francesco
Campi, Riccardo
Gudaru, Kalyan
Talwar, Ruchika
Okhunov, Zhamshid
Ng, Chi-Fai
Jain, Nitesh
Gauhar, Vineet
Wong, Martin Chi-Sang
Wroclawski, Marcelo Langer
Tanidir, Yiloren
Rivas, Juan Gomez
Tiong, Ho-Yee 
Loeb, Stacy
Keywords: Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Urology & Nephrology
Coronavirus disease-19
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Urological service
Issue Date: 1-Aug-2020
Publisher: ELSEVIER
Citation: Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun, Ong, William Lay Keat, Gonzalez-Padilla, Daniel, Castellani, Daniele, Dubin, Justin M, Esperto, Francesco, Campi, Riccardo, Gudaru, Kalyan, Talwar, Ruchika, Okhunov, Zhamshid, Ng, Chi-Fai, Jain, Nitesh, Gauhar, Vineet, Wong, Martin Chi-Sang, Wroclawski, Marcelo Langer, Tanidir, Yiloren, Rivas, Juan Gomez, Tiong, Ho-Yee, Loeb, Stacy (2020-08-01). A Global Survey on the Impact of COVID-19 on Urological Services. EUROPEAN UROLOGY 78 (2) : 265-275. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Abstract: Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) declared coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) as a pandemic on March 11, 2020. The impact of COVID-19 on urological services in different geographical areas is unknown. Objective: To investigate the global impact of COVID-19 on urological providers and the provision of urological patient care. Design, setting, and participants: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted from March 30, 2020 to April 7, 2020. A 55-item questionnaire was developed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on various aspects of urological services. Target respondents were practising urologists, urology trainees, and urology nurses/advanced practice providers. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary outcome was the degree of reduction in urological services, which was further stratified by the geographical location, degree of outbreak, and nature and urgency of urological conditions. The secondary outcome was the duration of delay in urological services. Results and limitations: A total of 1004 participants responded to our survey, and they were mostly based in Asia, Europe, North America, and South America. Worldwide, 41% of the respondents reported that their hospital staff members had been diagnosed with COVID-19 infection, 27% reported personnel shortage, and 26% had to be deployed to take care of COVID-19 patients. Globally, only 33% of the respondents felt that they were given adequate personal protective equipment, and many providers expressed fear of going to work (47%). It was of concerning that 13% of the respondents were advised not to wear a surgical face mask for the fear of scaring their patients, and 21% of the respondents were advised not to discuss COVID-19 issues or concerns on media. COVID-19 had a global impact on the cut-down of urological services, including outpatient clinic appointments, outpatient investigations and procedures, and urological surgeries. The degree of cut-down of urological services increased with the degree of COVID-19 outbreak. On average, 28% of outpatient clinics, 30% of outpatient investigations and procedures, and 31% of urological surgeries had a delay of >8 wk. Urological services for benign conditions were more affected than those for malignant conditions. Finally, 47% of the respondents believed that the accumulated workload could be dealt with in a timely manner after the COVID-19 outbreak, but 50% thought the postponement of urological services would affect the treatment and survival outcomes of their patients. One of the limitations of this study is that Africa, Australia, and New Zealand were under-represented. Conclusions: COVID-19 had a profound global impact on urological care and urology providers. The degree of cut-down of urological services increased with the degree of COVID-19 outbreak and was greater for benign than for malignant conditions. One-fourth of urological providers were deployed to assist with COVID-19 care. Many providers reported insufficient personal protective equipment and support from hospital administration. Patient summary: Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) has led to significant delay in outpatient care and surgery in urology, particularly in regions with the most COVID-19 cases. A considerable proportion of urology health care professionals have been deployed to assist in COVID-19 care, despite the perception of insufficient training and protective equipment. The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic has imposed great challenges to the urological community globally. The impact of COVID-19 on urological services increased with the degree of outbreak, and resulted in significant delay in the delivery of urological care.
ISSN: 0302-2838
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.025
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
A Global Survey on the Impact of COVID-19 on Urological Services.pdf1.69 MBAdobe PDF




checked on Jan 26, 2023

Page view(s)

checked on Jan 26, 2023


checked on Jan 26, 2023

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.