Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Mapping Ostrom’s common-pool resource systems coding handbook to the coupled infrastructure systems framework to enable comparative research
Authors: Michael J. Bernstein
Maria del Mar Mancha-Cisneros
Madeline Tyson
Ute Brady
Cathy Alida Rubinos
Hoon Cheol Shin 
Sechindra Vallury
Skaidra Smith-Heisters
Elicia Ratajczyk
Keywords: Common-pool resources
CPR frameworks
CPR governance
Institutional analysis and development framework
Qualitative coding methods
Research design
Issue Date: 8-May-2019
Publisher: Ubiquity Press
Citation: Michael J. Bernstein, Maria del Mar Mancha-Cisneros, Madeline Tyson, Ute Brady, Cathy Alida Rubinos, Hoon Cheol Shin, Sechindra Vallury, Skaidra Smith-Heisters, Elicia Ratajczyk (2019-05-08). Mapping Ostrom’s common-pool resource systems coding handbook to the coupled infrastructure systems framework to enable comparative research. International Journal of the Commons 13 (1) : 528-552. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Abstract: In the study of common-pool resource (CPR) governance, frameworks provide a metatheoretical language to describe system states, dynamics, elements, and relationships. The coding manuals which accompany CPR frame-works–in addition to providing guidelines for connecting empirical case work to conceptual variables–define a vocabulary of coding questions. For empirical work, connecting variables and coding questions with framework elements contributes to conceptual advance. In the process of analysis and publication, it is tempting to offer a novel framework without also developing, applying, or modifying the foundational questions and variables of coding manuals buttressing said frameworks. However, if the scholarly community is to generate robust knowledge for the study of CPR dilemmas, we must provide the underlying work of comparing across frameworks. In this paper, we report on one way the community might conduct such comparisons. We present results and challenges of using a group consensus process to link the more than 450 coding questions derived from the original Institutional Analysis and Development Framework (IADF) to the recently proposed Coupled Infrastructure Systems Framework (CISF). Despite overlap, discrepancies in the conceptual positions of the IADF and CISF suggest a need to modify or create new coding variables related to concepts of system boundaries, externalities, cross-scale interactions, multi-functionality, and technological change. We suggest that such work needs provisioning if commons scholars are to navigate the continued challenges of tailoring frameworks and coding manuals to evolving CPR governance dilemmas.
Source Title: International Journal of the Commons
ISSN: 1875-0281
DOI: 10.18352/ijc.904
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Hoon Cheol_Mapping Ostrom's common-pool resource systems coding handbook to ...pdf730.66 kBAdobe PDF




checked on Sep 23, 2022

Page view(s)

checked on Sep 22, 2022

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.