Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab032
DC FieldValue
dc.titleValidating Threat: IO Approval and Public Support for Joining Military Counterterrorism Coalitions
dc.contributor.authorStefano Recchia
dc.contributor.authorJonathan Art Chu
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-10T08:36:39Z
dc.date.available2022-03-10T08:36:39Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-28
dc.identifier.citationStefano Recchia, Jonathan Art Chu (2021-05-28). Validating Threat: IO Approval and Public Support for Joining Military Counterterrorism Coalitions. International Studies Quarterly 65 (4) : 919-928. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab032
dc.identifier.issn0020-8833
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/216884
dc.description.abstractRecent scholarship has fruitfully investigated the effect of international organization (IO) approval on public support for military intervention. Following Jentleson and Britton [Bruce W. Jentleson and Rebecca L. Britton, “Still Pretty Prudent: Post-Cold War American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 42, no. 4 (1998): 395-417], scholars argue that IO approval does not increase already high public support for “foreign policy restraint” (FPR) operations intended to coerce “aggressively threatening” opponents, including terrorists. We challenge this argument, focusing on public support for contributing to military coalitions. The public may wonder whether leaders are sincere when they frame a coalition military operation as having FPR objectives; this may lead the public to put a premium on multilateral validation. We also question the common argument that UN Security Council approval necessarily has a greater positive effect on public support for intervention than approval from regional IOs. Approval from broad-based regional IOs, such as the African Union (AU), may be just as consequential. Data from survey experiments that we conducted in three countries confirm our principal hypotheses: (1) IO approval consistently increases public support for contributing to military coalitions even in counterterrorism cases and (2) the UN and AU approval effects are of comparable magnitude. These findings expand our theoretical understanding of the conditions under which IO approval can increase public support for military intervention.
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentLEE KUAN YEW SCHOOL OF PUBLIC POLICY
dc.description.doi10.1093/isq/sqab032
dc.description.sourcetitleInternational Studies Quarterly
dc.description.volume65
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.page919-928
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Jonathan_Validating Threat_ IO Approval and Public Support for Joining Military Counterterrorism Coalitions.pdf335.85 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Dec 2, 2022

Page view(s)

54
checked on Dec 1, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.