Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.901
DC FieldValue
dc.titleSimulation of a combined cycle gas turbine power plant in Aspen HYSYS
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Z.
dc.contributor.authorKarimi, I.A.
dc.contributor.editorYan, J.
dc.contributor.editorYang, H.-X.
dc.contributor.editorChen, X.
dc.contributor.editorLi, H.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-07T03:52:29Z
dc.date.available2022-01-07T03:52:29Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationLiu, Z., Karimi, I.A. (2019). Simulation of a combined cycle gas turbine power plant in Aspen HYSYS. Energy Procedia 158 : 3620-3625. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.901
dc.identifier.issn1876-6102
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/213274
dc.description.abstractA detailed model is developed in Aspen HYSYS for simulating the operation of a triple-pressure reheat combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) power plant. To our knowledge, this is the first such model in the literature. A comparison with an equivalent GateCycle model shows that the predictions of the two models (Aspen HYSYS and GateCycle) are comparable. The average relative deviations for the power outputs and thermal efficiencies of the gas turbine, steam cycle, and CCGT plant are less than 2.0%. The minor discrepancies are primarily from the differences in gas enthalpy correlations. On the other hand, Aspen HYSYS may have some advantages over GateCycle. First, its use of the well-proven real-gas Peng-Robinson fluid package may give more accurate predictions. Second, it allows easy integration with various energy systems such as CO2 capture, organic Rankine cycles, fuel cells, LNG terminals, air separation, absorption chillers, etc. Third, its model can be made dynamic for predicting the real-time behaviour of a CCGT plant. © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of ICAE2018 - The 10th International Conference on Applied Energy.
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2019
dc.subjectAspen HYSYS
dc.subjectCombined cycle
dc.subjectGas turbine
dc.subjectPower plant
dc.subjectSimulation
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.contributor.departmentDEPT OF CHEMICAL & BIOMOLECULAR ENGG
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.901
dc.description.sourcetitleEnergy Procedia
dc.description.volume158
dc.description.page3620-3625
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1016_j_egypro_2019_01_901.pdf1.1 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

14
checked on Nov 25, 2022

Page view(s)

162
checked on Nov 17, 2022

Download(s)

2
checked on Nov 17, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons