Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
DC FieldValue
dc.titleImplementation of integrated care in Singapore: A complex adaptive system perspective
dc.contributor.authorNurjono, M.
dc.contributor.authorYoong, J.
dc.contributor.authorYap, P.
dc.contributor.authorWee, S.L.
dc.contributor.authorVrijhoef, H.J.M.
dc.identifier.citationNurjono, M., Yoong, J., Yap, P., Wee, S.L., Vrijhoef, H.J.M. (2018). Implementation of integrated care in Singapore: A complex adaptive system perspective. International Journal of Integrated Care 18 (4) : 4. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.description.abstractBackground: Integrated care that focuses on organising healthcare services around people and their communities rather than their diseases is promoted as the strategy to overcome the challenges associated with growing complexity in healthcare needs, demand for healthcare services and inadequate supply of services due to fragmentation in the provision of services. While conceptually appears to be simple, integrated care is made up of multicomponent delivery strategies targeting various levels of the healthcare system while engaging various stakeholders in their execution. Methods: We applied the complex adaptive system (CAS) perspective to two different initiatives that exemplify approaches towards integrating care in Singapore: the Regional Health System (RHS) model, implemented across healthcare institutions at the national level, and CARITAS Integrated Dementia Care implemented in the northern region of Singapore. We adopted an inductive approach in our analysis in which we studied the RHS and CARITAS Integrated Dementia Care according to the components of the CAS. We applied the typical characteristics of CAS: (i) diverse, interdependent and semi-autonomous actors (ii) self-organizing capacity and simple rules (iii) relationship with the bigger system, emergent behaviour and non-linearity in our analysis of key drivers behind the implementation of both the RHS and CARITAS integrated dementia care. Results: By considering the RHS and CARITAS as whole networks each comprising of interacting and adaptive components instead of separate entities within a bigger system, the CAS provided a new mindset in surfacing issues associated to the implementation of these integrated care networks. In addition to important actors, systems, it informed understanding of relationships and dependencies between different parts of the network – revealing the lack of homogeneity, conformity and difficulties in designing any optimal system in advance given the many moving parts. Conclusions: Drawing on the two examples of integrated care networks, this paper highlights the significance of effective collaboration built on a common focus, responsiveness to emergent behaviours, simple rules, the ability to self-organize and adapt in response to unexpected situations in further development of integrated care in the Singapore context and beyond. © 2018 The Author(s).
dc.publisherUbiquity Press
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.sourceScopus OA2018
dc.subjectComplex adaptive system
dc.subjectComplex healthcare interventions
dc.subjectIntegrated care
dc.contributor.departmentSAW SWEE HOCK SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.description.sourcetitleInternational Journal of Integrated Care
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_5334_ijic_4174.pdf1.97 MBAdobe PDF




checked on Dec 3, 2022

Page view(s)

checked on Dec 1, 2022

Google ScholarTM



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons