Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
DC FieldValue
dc.titleUse of Berlin questionnaire in comparison to polysomnography and home sleep study in patients with obstructive sleep apnea
dc.contributor.authorNg, S.S.
dc.contributor.authorTam, W.
dc.contributor.authorChan, T.-O.
dc.contributor.authorTo, K.-W.
dc.contributor.authorNgai, J.
dc.contributor.authorChan, K.K.P.
dc.contributor.authorYip, W.-H.
dc.contributor.authorLo, R.L.
dc.contributor.authorYiu, K.
dc.contributor.authorKo, F.W.
dc.contributor.authorHui, D.S.
dc.identifier.citationNg, S.S., Tam, W., Chan, T.-O., To, K.-W., Ngai, J., Chan, K.K.P., Yip, W.-H., Lo, R.L., Yiu, K., Ko, F.W., Hui, D.S. (2019). Use of Berlin questionnaire in comparison to polysomnography and home sleep study in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Respiratory Research 20 (1) : 40. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.description.abstractBackground: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a common disorder with significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the Berlin questionnaire in patients with suspected OSAS undergoing PSG in the sleep laboratory setting against those going through the Embletta™ portable diagnostic system (Embletta PDS) at home. Methods: Patients with suspected OSAS were recruited from respiratory clinics to complete Berlin questionnaire and Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS). Patients were randomized to undergo either home-based sleep test (group A) or hospital-based polysomnography (PSG) (group B). Results: Three hundreds and sixteen subjects with newly referred suspected OSAS were recruited and randomized into group A (n = 157) and group B (n = 159). The prevalence of moderate to severe OSAS defined as apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ? 15/h was 54%. The Berlin questionnaire identified 69.7% (n = 99) of subjects as high risk in group A and 77.5% (n = 100) in group B. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of the questionnaire to predict an AHI ? 15/h as diagnosed by PSG was 78, 23, 67 and 35%. When compared with Embletta PDS, the specificity and NPV increased to 48 and 63%. The area under the Receiver Operator Curve (ROC) based on PSG (AUC = 0.539, 95%CI 0.417, 0.661) and based on home Embletta (AUC = 0.712, 95%CI 0.617, 0.907). Conclusions: The questionnaire was not reliable in predicting OSAS through PSG AHI whereas there was some predictive ability in discriminating patients with OSAS from normal subjects based on home Embletta sleep test. Trial registration: The study was registered at (Identifier: NCT01828216) on 10 April 2013. © 2019 The Author(s).
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.sourceScopus OA2019
dc.subjectObstructive sleep apnea
dc.subjectSensitivity and specificity
dc.contributor.departmentDEPT OF NURSING/ALICE LEE CTR FOR NUR ST
dc.description.sourcetitleRespiratory Research
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12931-019-1009-y.pdf827.11 kBAdobe PDF




checked on Nov 24, 2022

Page view(s)

checked on Dec 1, 2022


checked on Dec 1, 2022

Google ScholarTM



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons