Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00073
Title: Lessons learnt from the 2009 padang indonesia, 2011 T?hoku Japan and 2016 muisne Ecuador earthquakes
Authors: Chian, S.C. 
Wilkinson, S.M.
Whittle, J.K.
Mulyani, R.
Alarcon, J.E.
Pomonis, A.
Saito, K.
Fraser, S.
Goda, K.
Macabuag, J.
Offord, M.
Hunt-Raby, A.C.
Sammonds, P.
Franco, G.
Stone, H.
Ahmed, B.
Hughes, F.E.
Jirouskova, N.K.
Kaminski, S.
Lopez, J.
Keywords: Buildings
Earthquakes
Foundations
Geospatial tools
Landslides
Muisne
Padang
T?hoku
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: Frontiers Media S.A.
Citation: Chian, S.C., Wilkinson, S.M., Whittle, J.K., Mulyani, R., Alarcon, J.E., Pomonis, A., Saito, K., Fraser, S., Goda, K., Macabuag, J., Offord, M., Hunt-Raby, A.C., Sammonds, P., Franco, G., Stone, H., Ahmed, B., Hughes, F.E., Jirouskova, N.K., Kaminski, S., Lopez, J. (2019). Lessons learnt from the 2009 padang indonesia, 2011 T?hoku Japan and 2016 muisne Ecuador earthquakes. Frontiers in Built Environment 5 : 73. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00073
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: This paper presents the observations during the UK Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team (EEFIT)'s post-earthquake reconnaissance missions to the September 20, 2009 Padang (Mw7.6), March 11, 2011 T?hoku (Mw9.0) and April 16, 2016 Muisne (Mw7.8) earthquakes. The performance of buildings and geotechnical structures within the affected regions were investigated to gain insights on their design and construction deficiencies. Findings on these damages observed are compared along with the characteristics of the earthquake and nature of building codes in these countries. They include building damages attributed to a combination of structural resonance, deficiencies in reinforcement detailing, vulnerability to soft story collapse, ground settlement, soil liquefaction, and landslides. It was demonstrated that buildings which were severely damaged had natural building frequencies coinciding with the dominant frequencies of the ground shaking. The locations of damage of several such buildings showed insufficient confining reinforcements and lapping of stirrup links. Soft story collapses were also observed in the three earthquakes, although many were attributed to old building codes that were less effective. In areas affected by the Muisne earthquake, soft story collapses were mainly found at mid height of the building rather than at the ground floor as observed in the Padang and T?hoku earthquakes, likely due to extension of building long after the bottom floors were completed. Such extension of building can either lead to local reduction in capacity due to weaker concrete-rebar bonding, possibly insufficient lapping of reinforcement, as well as increased axial loads. In the aspect of geotechnical failure, foundations of buildings found on piles performed reasonably well, except for areas affected by soil liquefaction. Landslides occurred following these earthquakes led to large concentration of casualties and property losses, motivating the EEFIT teams to invest efforts in hazard mapping and ground-truthing exercises using satellite images at Padang and Muisne earthquakes respectively. Such geospatial tools applied in these three earthquakes were reviewed and demonstrated to be capable of identifying landslide sites and producing reliable landslide hazard map. © 2019 Chian, Wilkinson, Whittle, Mulyani, Alarcon, Pomonis, Saito, Fraser, Goda, Macabuag, Offord, Hunt-Raby, Sammonds, Franco, Stone, Ahmed, Hughes, Jirouskova, Kaminski and Lopez.
Source Title: Frontiers in Built Environment
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/212304
ISSN: 22973362
DOI: 10.3389/fbuil.2019.00073
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3389_fbuil_2019_00073.pdf4.8 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Sep 30, 2022

Page view(s)

59
checked on Sep 29, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons