Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874364101812010181
DC FieldValue
dc.titleA review of corneal collagen cross-linking – Current trends in practice applications
dc.contributor.authorLim, L.
dc.contributor.authorLim, E.W.L.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-17T06:08:53Z
dc.date.available2021-12-17T06:08:53Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationLim, L., Lim, E.W.L. (2018). A review of corneal collagen cross-linking – Current trends in practice applications. Open Ophthalmology Journal 12 : 181-213. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874364101812010181
dc.identifier.issn18743641
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/210986
dc.description.abstractObjective: To review the literature on current applications of corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (CXL). Methods: A review of publications on corneal cross-linking was conducted. This included systemic reviews, randomized controlled clinical trials, cohort studies, case-controlled studies and case series. A summary of the publications is tabulated. Results: The original indication of riboflavin – Ultraviolet-A (UVA) induced corneal collagen cross-linking is to arrest the progression of keratoconus. Studies show that it is effective in arresting the progression of keratoconus and post-LASIK ectasia with the standard Dresden protocol (epithelium-off). There are also improvements in visual, keratometric and topographic measurements over time. Severe complications of cross-linking are rare. The epithelium-on techniques have less efficacy than the Dresden protocol. Accelerated protocols have variable results, with some studies reporting comparable outcomes to the Dresden protocol while other studies reporting less efficacious outcomes. Cross-linking combined with refractive procedures provide better visual outcome but long term studies are warranted. Cross-linking for the treatment of infective keratitis is a promising new treatment modality. Initial studies show that it is more effective for superficial rather than deep infections and for bacterial rather than fungal infections. Conclusions: Corneal cross-linking is a procedure with an expanding list of indications from the treatment of corneal ectasias to infective keratitis. While the standard Dresden protocol is established as the gold standard treatment for progressive keratoconus, the more recent protocols may require further refinements, investigative and long-term studies. © 2018 Limet al.
dc.publisherBentham Science Publishers B.V.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2018
dc.subjectCornea collagen cross-linking
dc.subjectDresden protocol
dc.subjectInfective keratitis
dc.subjectKeratoconus
dc.subjectPost-LASIK ectasia
dc.subjectUVA
dc.typeReview
dc.contributor.departmentYONG LOO LIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.description.doi10.2174/1874364101812010181
dc.description.sourcetitleOpen Ophthalmology Journal
dc.description.volume12
dc.description.page181-213
Appears in Collections:Students Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_2174_1874364101812010181.pdf524.47 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons