Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2403-12
DC FieldValue
dc.titleA preliminary evidence of transfer in the acquisition of sentential negation of English in multilingual Indonesian children in school contexts
dc.contributor.authorZen, E.L.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-14T04:50:22Z
dc.date.available2021-12-14T04:50:22Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationZen, E.L. (2018). A preliminary evidence of transfer in the acquisition of sentential negation of English in multilingual Indonesian children in school contexts. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature 24 (3) : 155-167. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2403-12
dc.identifier.issn0128-5157
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/210401
dc.description.abstractBilingual children in Indonesia have continued to develop their trilingual competence by adding English into their linguistic repertoires, in addition to Indonesian as the first language (L1) and Javanese or any other regional languages as the second language (L2). Considering the unique characteristics of third language (L3) acquisition in the way that it requires multidirectional interactions of three language systems, this study aimed at finding an evidence of L1 and L2 transfer in the acquisition of L3 sentential negation. In specific, it examined whether the absence of functional projection in Indonesian and Javanese negations would trigger transfer in the production of English negations, and testing out whether Cumulative Enhancement Model (CEM) worked best to the data. The CEM as one of L3 acquisition models encapsulates that any previous linguistic knowledge available to L3 learners will either enhance L3 learning or remain neutral. The English sentential negations were elicited from the already-available data sets; a limited corpus and in-class writing exercises of primary school learners aged 7-10 years old who were in an International Class Program in East Java, Indonesia where English became the medium of instruction. The findings demonstrated a preliminary evidence of transfer mainly in the absence of functional projections in English sentential negations resulted from a negative transfer of L1 and L2. More importantly, it suggested that the typological proximity of L1 and L2 had supported the cumulative effect in a negative way which was in contrast to the basic principle of CEM in which such collective process should enhance or be neutral when learning L3. Thus, this study has posited a theoretical implication of reconsidering the cumulative enhancement effect of L1 and L2 to the L3 by looking at the possibility of negative transfer. This current study has also imparted a practical implication for L3 teaching and learning with specific regard to English in that teachers can highlight any contrastive features embedded in learners’ L1, L2, and L3 to explicitly show the different patterns and uses. © Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. All rights reserved.
dc.publisherPenerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2018
dc.subjectCumulative Enhancement Model (CEM)
dc.subjectIndonesian multilingual children
dc.subjectL3 Acquisition Models
dc.subjectSentential Negation
dc.subjectTransfer
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.contributor.departmentDEPT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE & LITERATURE
dc.description.doi10.17576/3L-2018-2403-12
dc.description.sourcetitle3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature
dc.description.volume24
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.page155-167
Appears in Collections:Students Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_17576_3L-2018-2403-12.pdf279.59 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons