Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Modified criteria for diagnosing “cognitive frailty”
Authors: Won, C.W.
Lee, Y.
Kim, S.
Yoo, J.
Kim, M.
Ng, T.-P. 
Kim, H.
Son, S.J.
Keywords: Cognitive frailty
Instrumental activities of daily living
Mild cognitive impairment
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: Korean Neuropsychiatric Association
Citation: Won, C.W., Lee, Y., Kim, S., Yoo, J., Kim, M., Ng, T.-P., Kim, H., Son, S.J. (2018). Modified criteria for diagnosing “cognitive frailty”. Psychiatry Investigation 15 (9) : 839-842. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Abstract: The concept of cognitive frailty has recently been proposed by an International Consensus Group as the presence of physical frailty and cognitive impairment [defined using the Clinical Dementia Ratings (CDR)=0.5], without concurrent dementia. However, CDR is difficult to implement and not often available in epidemiologic studies or busy clinical settings, and an alternative to CDR is required. We suggest an alternative definition of cognitive frailty as: 1) physical frailty, 2) more than 1.5 standard deviation below the mean for age-, gender-, and education-adjusted norms on any cognitive function test (e.g., the Montreal Cognitive assessment test, the Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale, verbal learning test, Digit Span, Boston Naming Test, Trail Making Test, and Frontal Assessment Battery), and 3) no dependency in instrumental activities of daily living. The redefined criteria for cognitive frailty would be more feasible to implement and thus more applicable in epidemiologic studies and busy clinical settings. © 2018 Korean Neuropsychiatric Association.
Source Title: Psychiatry Investigation
ISSN: 1738-3684
DOI: 10.30773/PI.2018.05.22
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_30773_PI_2018_05_22.pdf320.59 kBAdobe PDF



Google ScholarTM



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons