Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00360
Title: Light-induced pupillary responses in Alzheimer's disease
Authors: Chougule, P.S.
Najjar, R.P. 
Finkelstein, M.T.
Kandiah, N. 
Milea, D. 
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease
Cholinergic deficit
Chromatic pupillometry
Dementia
Melanopsin expressing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells
Parkinson's disease
Post -llumination pupil response
Pupillary light response
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: Frontiers Media S.A.
Citation: Chougule, P.S., Najjar, R.P., Finkelstein, M.T., Kandiah, N., Milea, D. (2019). Light-induced pupillary responses in Alzheimer's disease. Frontiers in Neurology 10 : 360. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00360
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: The impact of Alzheimer's disease (AD) on the pupillary light response (PLR) is controversial, being dependent on the stage of the disease and on the experimental pupillometric protocols. The main hypothesis driving pupillometry research in AD is based on the concept that the AD-related neurodegeneration affects both the parasympathetic and the sympathetic arms of the PLR (cholinergic and noradrenergic theory), combined with additional alterations of the afferent limb, involving the melanopsin expressing retinal ganglion cells (mRGCs), subserving the PLR. Only a few studies have evaluated the value of pupillometry as a potential biomarker in AD, providing various results compatible with parasympathetic dysfunction, displaying increased latency of pupillary constriction to light, decreased constriction amplitude, faster redilation after light offset, decreased maximum velocity of constriction (MCV) and maximum constriction acceleration (MCA) compared to controls. Decreased MCV and MCA appeared to be the most accurate of all PLR parameters allowing differentiation between AD and healthy controls while increased post-illumination pupillary response was the most consistent feature, however, these results could not be replicated by more recent studies, focusing on early and pre-clinical stages of the disease. Whether static or dynamic pupillometry yields useful biomarkers for AD screening or diagnosis remains unclear. In this review, we synopsize the current knowledge on pupillometric features in AD and other neurodegenerative diseases, and discuss potential roles of pupillometry in AD detection, diagnosis and monitoring, alone or in combination with additional biomarkers. © 2019 Chougule, Najjar, Finkelstein, Kandiah and Milea. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Source Title: Frontiers in Neurology
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/209613
ISSN: 1664-2295
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00360
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3389_fneur_2019_00360.pdf922.65 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

40
checked on Jan 25, 2023

Page view(s)

81
checked on Jan 26, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons