A VISION REALISED OR A WORK IN PROGRESS? EXAMINING SPANDECK AND ITS CLAIM OF UNIVERSALITY IN THE TORT OF NEGLIGENCE

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/199589

DC Field	Value
dc.title	A VISION REALISED OR A WORK IN PROGRESS? EXAMINING SPANDECK AND ITS CLAIM OF UNIVERSALITY IN THE TORT OF NEGLIGENCE
dc.contributor.author	BRYAN LIM JUN HAO
dc.date.accessioned	2021-08-26T10:11:28Z
dc.date.available	2021-08-26T10:11:28Z
dc.date.issued	2000-06-11
dc.identifier.citation	BRYAN LIM JUN HAO (2000-06-11). A VISION REALISED OR A WORK IN PROGRESS? EXAMINING SPANDECK AND ITS CLAIM OF UNIVERSALITY IN THE TORT OF NEGLIGENCE. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.uri	https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/199589
dc.description.abstract	This paper critically evaluates the ideal envisioned in Spandeck Engineering (S) Pte Ltd v Defence Science & Technology Agency of having a single test to determine the duty of care arising under the tort of negligence. It seeks to examine whether the Spandeck formulation has been consistently applied by the Singapore courts since 2007 and whether it is truly a universal test applicable to all scenarios and all kinds of damage.
dc.type	Student Works
dc.contributor.department	LAW
dc.contributor.supervisor	EMMANUEL DAVID TAN KAH HENG
dc.description.degree	Bachelor's
dc.description.degreeconferred	Bachelor of Laws (Honours) (LL.B.)
Appears in Collections:	UROP/DR (Restricted)

File	Description	Size	Format	Access Settings	Version
2010_LL4396_UROP_A0183961W_FINAL.pdf		1.04 MB	Adobe PDF	RESTRICTED	None	Log In

Check