Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1787628
Title: Mobilizing Policy (In)Capacity to Fight COVID-19: Understanding Variations in State Responses
Authors: Capano, G.
Howlett, M.
Jarvis, D.S.L.
Ramesh, M. 
Goyal, N. 
Keywords: COVID-19
crisis management
pandemics
policy capacity
policy mixes
policy styles
policy tools
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Citation: Capano, G., Howlett, M., Jarvis, D.S.L., Ramesh, M., Goyal, N. (2020). Mobilizing Policy (In)Capacity to Fight COVID-19: Understanding Variations in State Responses. Policy and Society : 24-Jan. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1787628
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Abstract: The objective of this collection of essays is to gain insights into the different national-level state responses to COVID-19 around the world and the conditions that shaped them. The pandemic offers a natural experiment wherein the policy problem governments faced was the same but the responses they made were different, creating opportunities for comparison of both the kinds of policy tools being used and the factors that accounted for their choice. Accordingly, after surveying on-line databases of policy tools used in the pandemic and subjecting these to topic modelling to reveal the characteristics of a ‘standard’ national pandemic response, we discuss the similarities and differences found in specific responses. This is done with reference to the nature and level of policy capacity of respective governments, highlighting the critical roles played by (in)adequate preparation and lesson-drawing from past experiences with similar outbreaks or crises. Taken together the articles show how the national responses to the COVID-19 pandemic were shaped by the opportunity and capacity each government had to learn from previous pandemics and their capacity to operationalize and build political support for the standard portfolio of policy measures deployed to deal with the crisis. However, they also show how other factors such as the nature of national leadership, the organization of government and civil society, and blindspots towards the vulnerabilities of certain population segments also helped to shape policy responses to the pandemic. © 2020, © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Source Title: Policy and Society
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/197910
ISSN: 1449-4035
DOI: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1787628
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1080_14494035_2020_1787628.pdf4.75 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

113
checked on Nov 29, 2021

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

78
checked on Oct 5, 2021

Page view(s)

30
checked on Dec 2, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons