Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||People as intuitive prosecutors: The impact of social-control goals on attributions of responsibility||Authors:||Tetlock, P.E.
|Issue Date:||2007||Citation:||Tetlock, P.E., Rescober, P., Visser, P.S., Singh, R., Polifroni, M., Scott, A., Elson, S.B., Mazzocco, P. (2007). People as intuitive prosecutors: The impact of social-control goals on attributions of responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43 (2) : 195-209. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.02.009||Abstract:||Three experiments explored determinants of punitive character attributions to norm violators. Experiment 1 showed that ideological conservatism and manipulated threat to society increased anger and attributional punitiveness when there was ambiguity about culpability. Experiment 2 showed that informing observers that norm violations were widespread and rarely punished increased attributional punitiveness by activating anger-charged retributive goals. Experiment 3 showed that liberals and conservatives alike felt justified in assigning greater blame to high-status perpetrators who commit acts of negligence with more severe consequences but that only conservatives felt justified in doing so for low-status perpetrators. Overall, the results reinforce the hypothesis that societal threat activates a prosecutorial mindset identifiable by a correlated cluster of attributions, emotions, punishment goals and punitiveness. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.||Source Title:||Journal of Experimental Social Psychology||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/19588||ISSN:||00221031
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.