Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/193313
DC FieldValue
dc.titleTHE EFFECTIVENESS OF HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD'S SELECTIVE EN BLOC REDEVELOPMENT SCHEME (SERS)
dc.contributor.authorYEE KHIN HIONG YVONNE
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-02T08:48:43Z
dc.date.available2021-07-02T08:48:43Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.citationYEE KHIN HIONG YVONNE (2003). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD'S SELECTIVE EN BLOC REDEVELOPMENT SCHEME (SERS). ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/193313
dc.description.abstractMany developing countries are experiencing rapid ageing of housing. In this aspect, Singapore's success in nation-rejuvenation can provide useful lessons toward innovative policy-making for these countries. In Singapore, the Selective En Bloc Redevelopment Scheme (SERS) is part of the Government's estate renewal plans for older HDB estates. This study hypothesized that certain socio-economic characteristics of SERS residents such as income and age were likely to influence their response to SERS. In addition, the study aimed to identify the concerns of residents and to determine the factors that contribute to the residents' decision to buy a flat offered under the SERS programme. Lastly, this study explored other factors, which could be incorporated into the "relocation" package with a view to further enhance the effectiveness of SERS. Using data on 208 families from different SERS projects, the study revealed through chisquare (x 2) test that income and age of residents had influenced their response on SERS. Hence, the repayment of mortgage loan was found to be the main concern, especially among the older and lower income residents. Further, factor analysis was used to determine the factors that influenced residents' decision to buy a flat offered under SERS. It was found that finance was the main factor that had influenced the residents' decision to buy a flat offered under SERS. This was followed by location, administrative, reasonable waiting time and social factors. Several possible explanations for these factors were offered. Findings also suggested that credit assessment should be imposed on residents who upgrade. However, the impositions of such policy would implied that the objective to allow residents to upgrade would have to be moderated to provision of subsidized housing on a need basis.
dc.sourceSDE BATCHLOAD 20210702
dc.typeThesis
dc.contributor.departmentSCHOOL OF BUILDING & REAL ESTATE
dc.contributor.supervisorSIM LOO LEE
dc.description.degreeBachelor's
dc.description.degreeconferredBACHELOR OF SCIENCE (REAL ESTATE)
dc.published.stateUnpublished
Appears in Collections:Bachelor's Theses

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
EfYkhy.pdf56.59 MBAdobe PDF

RESTRICTED

NoneLog In

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.