Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-11-36
Title: Validation of the kidney disease quality of life-short form: A cross-sectional study of a dialysis-targeted health measure in singapore
Authors: Joshi, V.D
Mooppil, N
Lim, J.F.Y 
Keywords: adult
age distribution
article
construct validity
cross-sectional study
educational status
ethnic difference
female
health status
hemodialysis
human
income
India
Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form
major clinical study
male
medical information
psychometry
quality of life
reliability
Singapore
validation process
chronic kidney failure
comparative study
health survey
middle aged
psychological aspect
renal replacement therapy
Singapore
treatment outcome
validation study
Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Health Status Indicators
Humans
Kidney Failure, Chronic
Male
Middle Aged
Quality of Life
Renal Dialysis
Singapore
Treatment Outcome
Issue Date: 2010
Citation: Joshi, V.D, Mooppil, N, Lim, J.F.Y (2010). Validation of the kidney disease quality of life-short form: A cross-sectional study of a dialysis-targeted health measure in singapore. BMC Nephrology 11 (1) : 36. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-11-36
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background. In Singapore, the prevalence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and the number of people on dialysis is increasing. The impact of ESRD on patient quality of life has been recognized as an important outcome measure. The Kidney Disease Quality Of Life-Short Form (KDQOL-SF) has been validated and is widely used as a measure of quality of life in dialysis patients in many countries, but not in Singapore. We aimed to determine the reliability and validity of the KDQOL-SF for haemodialysis patients in Singapore. Methods. From December 2006 through January 2007, this cross-sectional study gathered data on patients 21 years old, who were undergoing haemodialysis at National Kidney Foundation in Singapore. We used exploratory factor analysis to determine construct validity of the eight KDQOL-SF sub-scales, Cronbach's alpha coefficient to determine internal consistency reliability, correlation of the overall health rating with kidney disease-targeted scales to confirm validity, and correlation of the eight sub-scales with age, income and education to determine convergent and divergent validity. Results. Of 1980 haemodialysis patients, 1180 (59%) completed the KDQOL-SF. Full information was available for 980 participants, with a mean age of 56 years. The sample was representative of the total dialysis population in Singapore, except Indian ethnicity that was over-represented. The instrument designers' proposed eight sub-scales were confirmed, which together accounted for 68.4% of the variance. All sub-scales had a Cronbach's above the recommended minimum value of 0.7 to indicate good reliability (range: 0.72 to 0.95), except for Social function (0.66). Correlation of items within subscales was higher than correlation of items outside subscales in 90% of the cases. The overall health rating positively correlated with kidney disease-targeted scales, confirming validity. General health subscales were found to have significant associations with age, income and education, confirming convergent and divergent validity. Conclusions. The psychometric properties of the KDQOL-SF resulting from this first-time administration of the instrument support the validity and reliability of the KDQOL-SF as a measure of quality of life of haemodialysis patients in Singapore. It is, however, necessary to determine the test-retest reliability of the KDQOL-SF among the haemodialysis population of Singapore. © 2010 Joshi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Source Title: BMC Nephrology
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/181651
ISSN: 14712369
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-11-36
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_1471-2369-11-36.pdf319.16 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons