Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-105
Title: A comparison of comorbidities obtained from hospital administrative data and medical charts in older patients with pneumonia
Authors: Chong, W.F
Ding, Y.Y 
Heng, B.H
Keywords: age
aged
article
comorbidity
cross-sectional study
female
geriatric assessment
health survey
hospital management
hospitalization
human
male
middle aged
pathology
pneumonia
predictive value
regression analysis
retrospective study
risk assessment
Singapore
statistics
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Comorbidity
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Geriatric Assessment
Health Status Indicators
Hospital Administration
Hospitalization
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pneumonia
Predictive Value of Tests
Regression Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Singapore
Issue Date: 2011
Citation: Chong, W.F, Ding, Y.Y, Heng, B.H (2011). A comparison of comorbidities obtained from hospital administrative data and medical charts in older patients with pneumonia. BMC Health Services Research 11 : 105. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-105
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: The use of comorbidities in risk adjustment for health outcomes research is frequently necessary to explain some of the observed variations. Medical charts reviews to obtain information on comorbidities is laborious. Increasingly, electronic health care databases have provided an alternative for health services researchers to obtain comorbidity information. However, the rates obtained from databases may be either over- or under-reported. This study aims to (a) quantify the agreement between administrative data and medical charts review across a set of comorbidities; and (b) examine the factors associated with under- or over-reporting of comorbidities by administrative data. Methods. This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients aged 55 years and above, hospitalized for pneumonia at 3 acute care hospitals. Information on comorbidities were obtained from an electronic administrative database and compared with information from medical charts review. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors that were associated with under- or over-reporting of comorbidities by administrative data. Results: The prevalence of almost all comorbidities obtained from administrative data was lower than that obtained from medical charts review. Agreement between comorbidities obtained from medical charts and administrative data ranged from poor to very strong (kappa 0.01 to 0.78). Factors associated with over-reporting of comorbidities were increased length of hospital stay, disease severity, and death in hospital. In contrast, those associated with under-reporting were number of comorbidities, age, and hospital admission in the previous 90 days. Conclusions: The validity of using secondary diagnoses from administrative data as an alternative to medical charts for identification of comorbidities varies with the specific condition in question, and is influenced by factors such as age, number of comorbidities, hospital admission in the previous 90 days, severity of illness, length of hospitalization, and whether inhospital death occurred. These factors need to be taken into account when relying on administrative data for comorbidity information. © 2011 Chong et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Source Title: BMC Health Services Research
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/181635
ISSN: 14726963
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-105
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_1472-6963-11-105.pdf362.73 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons