Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0070-4
Title: The acceptability of conducting data linkage research without obtaining consent: lay people's views and justifications
Authors: Xafis, V 
Keywords: adult
comprehension
confidentiality
electronic health record
ethics
human
information dissemination
information retrieval
informed consent
methodology
patient satisfaction
personnel
qualitative research
statistics and numerical data
Adult
Comprehension
Confidentiality
Electronic Health Records
Humans
Information Dissemination
Information Storage and Retrieval
Informed Consent
Patient Satisfaction
Qualitative Research
Research Design
Research Personnel
Issue Date: 2015
Citation: Xafis, V (2015). The acceptability of conducting data linkage research without obtaining consent: lay people's views and justifications. BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1) : 70. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0070-4
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: A key ethical issue arising in data linkage research relates to consent requirements. Patients' consent preferences in the context of health research have been explored but their consent preferences regarding data linkage specifically have been under-explored. In addition, the views on data linkage are often those of patient groups. As a result, little is known about lay people's views and their preferences about consent requirements in the context of data linkage. This study explores lay people's views and justifications regarding the acceptability of conducting data linkage research without obtaining consent. Methods: A qualitative study explored lay people's views regarding consent requirements in data linkage via four hypothetical data linkage scenarios of increasing complexity. Prior to considering the scenarios, participants were provided with information regarding best practice data linkage processes via discussion and a diagrammatic representation of the process. Results: Lay people were able to understand the intricate processes involved in data linkage and the key protections afforded within a short amount of time. They were supportive of data linkage research and, on the whole, believed it should be conducted without consent provided a data linkage organization de-identifies the data used so that researchers do not handle identifiable data. Many thought that de-identified data holds a different status to identifiable data and should be used without specific consent in research that aims to benefit society. In weighing up conflicting values and interests, participants shifted consent preferences before arriving at their final consent preference for each scenario and provided justifications for their choices. They considered the protection of people's information, societal benefits, and the nature and constraints of research and recognized that these need to be balanced. Conclusions: With some exposure to the features of data linkage, lay people have the capacity to understand the processes sufficiently in order to consider ethical issues associated with consent preferences. Shifts in views reveal the complexity of such decisions. While privacy protection remained an important consideration for most participants, adequate protection measures adopted in best practice data linkage were viewed by most as protection enough for data linkage to proceed without specific individual consent. © 2015 Xafis.
Source Title: BMC Medical Ethics
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/181419
ISSN: 14726939
DOI: 10.1186/s12910-015-0070-4
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12910-015-0070-4.pdf822.04 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

36
checked on May 21, 2022

Page view(s)

128
checked on May 26, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons