Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.5694/mja12.11121
Title: Feasibility of screening for diabetic retinopathy at an Australian pathology collection service: A pilot study
Authors: Larizza, M.F.L
Hodgson, L.A
Fenwick, E.K
Kawasaki, R
Audehm, R
Wang, J.J 
Wong, T.Y 
Lamoureux, E.L 
Keywords: adult
aged
article
Australia
cross-sectional study
diabetic retinopathy
disease severity
eye photography
feasibility study
female
health care facility
human
information dissemination
insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
major clinical study
male
mass screening
non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy
patient attitude
pilot study
vision test
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diabetic Retinopathy
Feasibility Studies
Female
Fluorescein Angiography
Fundus Oculi
Humans
Male
Mass Screening
Middle Aged
Patient Compliance
Pilot Projects
Victoria
Young Adult
Issue Date: 2013
Citation: Larizza, M.F.L, Hodgson, L.A, Fenwick, E.K, Kawasaki, R, Audehm, R, Wang, J.J, Wong, T.Y, Lamoureux, E.L (2013). Feasibility of screening for diabetic retinopathy at an Australian pathology collection service: A pilot study. Medical Journal of Australia 198 (2) : 97-99. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja12.11121
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of a novel diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening model using a pathology collection centre (PCC) as a screening site. Design and setting: Cross-sectional pilot study conducted in one urban PCC in Victoria between 1 September 2009 and 15 March 2010. Trained pathology staff screened participants for DR using undilated, non-stereoscopic colour fundus photography. Participants: Participants were patients who spoke English, were aged at least 12 years, had type 1 or type 2 diabetes, and did not undertake biannual DR screening. Main outcome measures: Proportion of patients who do not participate in biannual DR screening; proportion of patients who accept DR screening while attending a PCC; proportion of gradable images; patient acceptance of the screening model; and effectiveness of the follow-up pathway. Results: Over 6 months, 289 English-speaking patients with diabetes attended the PCC, of whom 99 (34.3%) had not undertaken biannual DR screening. Of these, 93 (93.9%) accepted our screening service. Overall, retinal images were sufficient for interpretation in 88 patients (94.6%) and the median time for photography was 6 minutes (interquartile range, 10 minutes). Two, eight and six cases of minimal, mild and moderate non-proliferative DR (NPDR) in the worst eye were found, respectively. Dissemination of screening results to treating doctors and patients was found to be suboptimal and will need to be revised. Conclusion: DR screening in one urban PCC appears to be a feasible alternative for diabetic patients who do not undertake biannual screening for DR.
Source Title: Medical Journal of Australia
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/180803
ISSN: 0025-729X
DOI: 10.5694/mja12.11121
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_5694_mja12_11121.pdf201.89 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
checked on Jan 20, 2021

Page view(s)

25
checked on Jan 21, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons