Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/180664
DC FieldValue
dc.titleSHAME AND GUILT IN RELATION TO INTERDEPENDENCE
dc.contributor.authorCHAN POEY URNN
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T02:43:22Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27T02:43:22Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.citationCHAN POEY URNN (2000). SHAME AND GUILT IN RELATION TO INTERDEPENDENCE. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/180664
dc.description.abstractMost Western theorists agree that shame involves a sense that the entire self is bad while guilt involves a focus on specific misdeeds (Lewis, 1971). ln light of emotion theorists' claims that culture shapes emotions experiences (Wallbott & Scherer, 1995), we would like to examine the relevance of Lewis' concept of shame and guilt to our collectivist culture. Our study shows that guilt proneness is positively related to different measures of interdependence, namely, "concern with other's evaluation" and both institutional and affective interdependence. This suggests that collectivistic cultures are not just "shame cultures" (Benedict, 1946) but "guilt cultures" as well. In contrast, shame proneness is unrelated to all measures of interdependence. In view of this, we propose an interdependent concept of shame.
dc.sourceCCK BATCHLOAD 20201023
dc.typeThesis
dc.contributor.departmentSOCIAL WORK & PSYCHOLOGY
dc.contributor.supervisorCHANG WEINING C
dc.description.degreeBachelor's
dc.description.degreeconferredBACHELOR OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (HONOURS)
Appears in Collections:Bachelor's Theses

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
B22012527.PDF1.06 MBAdobe PDF

RESTRICTED

NoneLog In

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.