Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/179453
DC FieldValue
dc.titleGOLF COURSE VERSUS PUBLIC PARKS IN SINGAPORE : A SOCIAL COST BENEFIT APPROACH
dc.contributor.authorWONG SOO CHEN
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-23T04:38:19Z
dc.date.available2020-10-23T04:38:19Z
dc.date.issued1994
dc.identifier.citationWONG SOO CHEN (1994). GOLF COURSE VERSUS PUBLIC PARKS IN SINGAPORE : A SOCIAL COST BENEFIT APPROACH. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/179453
dc.description.abstractPublic parks and golf courses are alternatives in land use. They are a source of conflict because of scarcity of land in Singapore and because of the delicate equity issue of why golfers should have such vast open spaces (at a subsidy) at the expense of the public. The conflict is made worse by the fact that golf courses usually sit on the very few irreversible natural areas left in Singapore. Therefore, implicitly this study is also a reflection of the conservation-versus-development issue regarding natural sites. To help resolve the conflict, a social cost-benefit analysis is used. It proves to be superior compared to the market-mechanism-and-profitability criterion for appraising project because it takes all social costs (external or internal) and social benefits (tangible or intangible) into consideration. Under the assumption of an additive social welfare function, with no distributional weights attached, it is found that a public nature park is socially more beneficial than a golf course. The result of this study therefore provides support for the conservation of natural areas faced with an imminent threat of a golf course development. At the same time, the government should re-examine the rent they charge to golf clubs when currently this does not reflect the full opportunity cost. This study gives more emphasis to a description of the various costs and benefits involved. It does not provide a vigorous quantification of the costs and benefits. Nonetheless, a rough quantification is done, based on an inferential basis; i.e., different sources that best fit the situations in the study are used as references. However, it is believed that this in no way diminishes the usefulness of the study because it has succeeded in achieving the aim of presenting in an organized form the issues involved in the conflict of land uses and given the constraint of time and resources, it has provided a second best, objective analysis of the issues.
dc.sourceCCK BATCHLOAD 20201023
dc.typeThesis
dc.contributor.departmentECONOMICS & STATISTICS
dc.contributor.supervisorROGER SANDILANDS
dc.description.degreeBachelor's
dc.description.degreeconferredBACHELOR OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (HONOURS)
Appears in Collections:Bachelor's Theses

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
B19474532.PDF3.39 MBAdobe PDF

RESTRICTED

NoneLog In

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.