Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30071
DC FieldValue
dc.titleAll framing effects are not created equal: Low convergent validity between two classic measurements of framing
dc.contributor.authorZhen, S
dc.contributor.authorYu, R
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-22T02:53:48Z
dc.date.available2020-10-22T02:53:48Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationZhen, S, Yu, R (2016). All framing effects are not created equal: Low convergent validity between two classic measurements of framing. Scientific Reports 6 : 30071. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30071
dc.identifier.issn20452322
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/178887
dc.description.abstractHuman risk-taking attitudes can be influenced by two logically equivalent but descriptively different frames, termed the framing effect. The classic hypothetical vignette-based task (Asian disease problem) and a recently developed reward-based gambling task have been widely used to assess individual differences in the framing effect. Previous studies treat framing bias as a stable trait that has genetic basis. However, these two paradigms differ in terms of task domain (loss vs. gain) and task context (vignette-based vs. reward-based) and the convergent validity of these measurements remains unknown. Here, we developed a vignette-based task and a gambling task in both gain and loss domains and tested correlations of the framing effect among these tasks in 159 young adults. Our results revealed no significant correlation between the vignette-based task in the loss domain and the gambling task in the gain domain, indicating low convergent validity. The current findings raise the question of how to measure the framing effect precisely, especially in individual difference studies using large samples and expensive neuroscience methods. Our results suggest that the framing effect is influenced by both task domain and task context and future research should be cautious about the operationalization of the framing effect.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDEPT OF PSYCHOLOGY
dc.description.doi10.1038/srep30071
dc.description.sourcetitleScientific Reports
dc.description.volume6
dc.description.page30071
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1038_srep30071.pdf1.6 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Jan 24, 2021

Page view(s)

20
checked on Jan 14, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons