Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
DC FieldValue
dc.titleAssessment of land use impact on hydraulic threshold conditions for gully head cut initiation
dc.contributor.authorNazari Samani, A
dc.contributor.authorChen, Q
dc.contributor.authorKhalighi, S
dc.contributor.authorJames Wasson, R
dc.contributor.authorRahdari, M.R
dc.identifier.citationNazari Samani, A, Chen, Q, Khalighi, S, James Wasson, R, Rahdari, M.R (2016). Assessment of land use impact on hydraulic threshold conditions for gully head cut initiation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 20 (7) : 3005-3012. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.description.abstractA gully as an accelerated erosion process is responsible for land degradation under various environmental conditions and has been known as a threshold phenomenon. Although the effects of gullying processes have been well documented, few soil erosion models have taken into account the threshold condition necessary for gully development. This research was devoted to determining the effects of land use change on hydraulic threshold condition and stream power of water flow through an in situ experimental flume (15m × 0.4 m). Results indicated that head cut initiation and detachment rates showed a better correlation to stream power indices than shear stress (τcr). The threshold unit stream power value (ωu) for head cut initiation in rangeland, abandoned land, and dry farming land was 0.0276, 0.0149, and 4.5 × 10-5ms-1, respectively. Moreover, the micro-relief condition of soil surface and surface vegetation affected the flow regime of discharge and velocity. It is seen that the composite hydraulic criteria of Froude number (Fr) and discharge (Q) can clearly discriminate the land uses' threshold. In fact, the remarkable decrease of τcrin dry farming was related to the effect of tillage practice on soil susceptibility and aggregate strength. The findings indicated that using the unit steam power index instead of critical shear stress could increase the models' precision for prediction of head cut development. Compared to the Ephemeral Gully Erosion Model (EGEM) equation for critical shear stress, it is important to point out that for modelling of gully erosion, using single soil attributes can lead to an inaccurate estimation for τcr. In addition, based on the findings of this research, the use of threshold values of τcr= 35 dyne cm-2and ωu=0.4 cm s-1in physically based soil erosion models is susceptible to high uncertainty when assessing gully erosion. © 2016 Author(s).
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20200831
dc.subjectFlow of water
dc.subjectShear stress
dc.subjectUncertainty analysis
dc.subjectAggregate strength
dc.subjectCritical shear stress
dc.subjectEnvironmental conditions
dc.subjectEphemeral gully erosions
dc.subjectSoil-erosion model
dc.subjectSurface vegetation
dc.subjectThreshold condition
dc.subjectThreshold phenomena
dc.subjectLand use
dc.subjectenvironmental assessment
dc.subjectenvironmental conditions
dc.subjectenvironmental modeling
dc.subjectFroude number
dc.subjectgully erosion
dc.subjectland degradation
dc.subjectland type
dc.subjectland use change
dc.subjectshear stress
dc.subjectsoil erosion
dc.subjectwater flow
dc.contributor.departmentLEE KUAN YEW SCHOOL OF PUBLIC POLICY
dc.description.sourcetitleHydrology and Earth System Sciences
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_5194_hess-20-3005-2016.pdf1.43 MBAdobe PDF




checked on Jan 17, 2022

Page view(s)

checked on Jan 20, 2022

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.