CHRISTIAN SOCIAL WORKERS AND COUNSELLORS : AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF THEIR THEORETICAL BASE FOR COUNSELLING""

Abstract

This study explores the theoretical base for counselling practice among Christian practitioners in Singapore. It seeks to uncover whether practitioners subscribe to their secular counselling training, their religious beliefs and values, or a combination of the two as their theoretical base. The process of arriving at a position is also explored. As this area has yet to be researched upon, questions were developed based on the positions and issues uncovered in the literature review. A heterogeneous group of subjects were selected for greater variation. Criteria for selection included age, gender, length of experience, service type and setting. Education and training, and religiosity were explored in the interview. Fifteen face-to-face interviews were conducted. An interview guide format was used. Each interview was taped, transcribed, coded and presented in the form of a case summary. Major themes were also elicited and presented. Major findings are as follows. (1) All subjects interviewed are subscribes to a combination of their secular training and their religious worldview as their theoretical base. They are positive towards such an endeavour. (2) All subjects highlighted the need for the element of spirituality to be considered in counselling. Their personal religious worldview was often cited. (3) While these subjects emphasize the importance of their beliefs in counselling practice, they reported to be sensitive to their clients. They do not impose their personal beliefs or worldview, though some of them do share with the clients what these are. (4) Value clashes are frequent, one common struggle is their not being able to share their faith with their clients. Finally, (5) These subjects are generally accountable, ethical and professional in the way they translate their theoretical base into practice. It is also found that the process that they go through in determining their position is long, and can be seen in two stages. Many factors also contribute to this process. Findings were then discussed with particular reference to theory-building and practice. Implications on theory, practice, research and policy-making were then drawn before the study closes with a conclusion.