Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/168708
DC FieldValue
dc.titleTHE EFFECTIVENESS OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION THERAPY ON CHRONIC WOUNDS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
dc.contributor.authorCHIA YUE HUI GERALDINE
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-29T13:06:27Z
dc.date.available2020-05-29T13:06:27Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-09
dc.identifier.citationCHIA YUE HUI GERALDINE (2020-04-09). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION THERAPY ON CHRONIC WOUNDS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/168708
dc.description.abstractBackground: Chronic diseases are a global health burden that requires immediate attention. The ageing population sets precedence to an array of chronic diseases, which are risk factors for chronic wounds. Electrical stimulation therapy (EST) have been used extensively in fields of psychiatry and chronic pain management. With advancements in technology, EST have also been tested in the field of chronic wound management, with notable benefits. Aims: The present review aims to evaluate-the clinical efficacy-of EST on chronic wounds and examine its effectiveness in its implementation into clinical guidelines. Methods: An extensive literature search has been conducted in The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ProQuest Thesis and Dissertation and other trial registries for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The search was based of the concepts: ‘chronic wounds’ and ‘electrical stimulation therapy’. Meta-analyses were performed using the RevMan software. Heterogeneity was measured using the I2 and ?2 values, and the overall effect was evaluated with the Z-statistics. Quality of studies and certainty of evidence was appraised using the risk of bias tool from Cochrane and GRADE respectively. Results: A total of 4462 articles were examined, and 11 articles were included into this review, for a total of 515 participants, ranging from 5 countries. EST was found to increase proportion of completely healed wounds by 4.30 times more than placebo or standard wound care (SWC). It also decreases wound area by 1.54% and increases percentage area reduction by 16.16%, as compared to placebo or SWC. Conclusion and implications: EST benefits chronic wounds and enhances chronic wound closure, but current evidence is insufficient to justify clinical implementation. The implications of this research is that future research must adopt a high methodological quality, as well as more researches should be done to look into the qualitative impact of EST on chronic wound patients.
dc.subjectChronic disease
dc.subjectwound healing
dc.subjectulcers
dc.subjectelectrical stimulation therapy
dc.typeThesis
dc.contributor.departmentNURSING/ALICE LEE CTR FOR NURSING STUD
dc.contributor.supervisorTAM WAI SAN, WILSON
dc.description.degreeBachelor's
dc.description.degreeconferredBACHELOR OF SCIENCE (NURSING)(HONOURS)
Appears in Collections:Bachelor's Theses

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
CHIA YUE HUI GERALDINE_A0158814X.pdf2.12 MBAdobe PDF

RESTRICTED

NoneLog In

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.