EVALUATION OF S9(6)(C) OF PLANNING ACT 1985 - THE 30% RULE

Abstract

This dissertation sets out to examine two issues: (a)whether the 30% rule, S9(6)(c), does facilitate better maintenance of buildings; and (b)whether owner-occupation is a contributing factor to better maintenance of buildings. The methodology of research includes a physical inspection of the condition of eight selected buildings, a survey of tenants and a survey of thirty professionals. It is found that the 30% rule does not cause buildings to be better maintained while owner-occupation is a positive factor to better maintenance. From the results of mailed questionnaires to professionals, the problems faced with respect to the 30% rule includes: (1)cashflow of the owner of the 30% or more interest; (2)apathy amongst subsidiary proprietors; and finally (3)decisions by management council can be easily influenced by the substantial owner. Alternatives proposed includes greater participation by the rest of the subsidiary proprietors, control of quality of materials used here, tax incentives and a minimum sum to be set aside statutorily as sinking fund.