Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/162171
DC FieldValue
dc.titleA STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF RAINFALL IN SINGAPORE
dc.contributor.authorJUNE KOH SIEW SAN
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-15T04:01:18Z
dc.date.available2019-11-15T04:01:18Z
dc.date.issued1986
dc.identifier.citationJUNE KOH SIEW SAN (1986). A STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF RAINFALL IN SINGAPORE. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/162171
dc.description.abstractIn Singapore, the prevalence of the North-East and SouthWest monsoons over the periods of November to March and May to September respectively, seem to indicate that cur monthly rainfall could possess a seasonality of about six months in period. However, whether such pattern is significant is not clear without furthur analysis. Hence, it is necessary to do a time series analysis on the data, in order to extract more accurate information about how the pattern of Singapore's monthly rainfall varies over time, for the important purpose of making forecasts. This exercise adopts one of the most effective and versatile method of analysing time series - the Box-Jenkins approach, to analyse our monthly rainfall data in millimeters, over a period of 15 years or 192 months, from January 1969 to December 1984. First, common models employed in the Box-Jenkins methodology are introduced with the important concepts of stationarity, autocorrelations and partial autocorrelations. Next, the process or model building which involves the Box-Jenkins three-stage cycle of identification, estimation and diagnostic checking for these models is discussed. Thereafter, it is shown how a satisfactory fitted model can be used for forecasting future time series values. After laying the theoretical groundwork of the Box-Jenkins approach to time series modelling, the final part of this exercise comprises of its application in fitting appropriate model(s) to our log-transformed rainfall data. Two models, the ARMA(1,1) and the AR(l) model, are considered, Between the two, the ARMA(1,1) was found to be the legitimate model in terms of having fulfilled requirements in diagnostic checking. Although inadequacy was detected in the AR(l) model, it is not completely discarded due to its more parsimonious nature and satisfactory forecasting performance.
dc.sourceCCK BATCHLOAD 20191115
dc.typeThesis
dc.contributor.departmentECONOMICS & STATISTICS
dc.contributor.supervisorCHEN SHU MEI
dc.description.degreeBachelor's
dc.description.degreeconferredBACHELOR OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (HONOURS)
Appears in Collections:Bachelor's Theses

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
b14295672.PDF1.43 MBAdobe PDF

RESTRICTED

NoneLog In

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.