Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002554
Title: Breastfeeding during infancy and neurocognitive function in adolescence: 16-year follow-up of the PROBIT cluster-randomized trial
Authors: Yang S.
Martin R.M.
Oken E.
Hameza M.
Doniger G.
Amit S.
Patel R.
Thompson J.
Rifas-Shiman S.L.
Vilchuck K.
Bogdanovich N.
Kramer M.S. 
Keywords: adolescence
adolescent
article
breast feeding education
child
controlled study
effect size
female
follow up
human
human experiment
infancy
infant
instrumental variable analysis
intervention study
major clinical study
male
measurement error
memory
observational study
randomized controlled trial
secondary analysis
adolescent development
adult
breast feeding
child psychology
clinical trial
cluster analysis
cognition
follow up
health promotion
intention to treat analysis
multicenter study
newborn
physiology
psychology
young adult
Adolescent
Adolescent Development
Adult
Breast Feeding
Cluster Analysis
Cognition
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Health Promotion
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Intention to Treat Analysis
Male
Psychology, Adolescent
Young Adult
Issue Date: 2018
Citation: Yang S., Martin R.M., Oken E., Hameza M., Doniger G., Amit S., Patel R., Thompson J., Rifas-Shiman S.L., Vilchuck K., Bogdanovich N., Kramer M.S. (2018). Breastfeeding during infancy and neurocognitive function in adolescence: 16-year follow-up of the PROBIT cluster-randomized trial. PLoS Medicine 15 (4) : e1002554. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002554
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: Evidence on the long-term effect of breastfeeding on neurocognitive development is based almost exclusively on observational studies. In the 16-year follow-up study of a large, cluster-randomized trial of a breastfeeding promotion intervention, we evaluated the long-term persistence of the neurocognitive benefits of the breastfeeding promotion intervention previously observed at early school age. Methods and findings: A total of 13,557 participants (79.5% of the 17,046 randomized) of the Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT) were followed up at age 16 from September 2012 to July 2015. At the follow-up, neurocognitive function was assessed in 7 verbal and nonverbal cognitive domains using a computerized, self-administered test battery among 13,427 participants. Using an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis as our prespecified primary analysis, we estimated cluster- and baseline characteristic-adjusted mean differences between the intervention (prolonged and exclusive breastfeeding promotion modelled on the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative) and control (usual care) groups in 7 cognitive domains and a global cognitive score. In our prespecified secondary analysis, we estimated mean differences by instrumental variable (IV) analysis to account for noncompliance with the randomly assigned intervention and estimate causal effects of breastfeeding. The 16-year follow-up rates were similar in the intervention (79.7%) and control groups (79.3%), and baseline characteristics were comparable between the two. In the cluster-adjusted ITT analyses, children in the intervention group did not show statistically significant differences in the scores from children in the control group. Prespecified additional adjustment for baseline characteristics improved statistical precision and resulted in slightly higher scores among children in the intervention for verbal function (1.4 [95% CI 0.3?2.5]) and memory (1.2 [95% CI 0.01?2.4]). IV analysis showed that children who were exclusively breastfed for �3 (versus <3) months had a 3.5-point (95% CI 0.9?6.1) higher verbal function, but no differences were observed in other domains. While our computerized, self-administered cognitive testing reduced the cluster-level variability in the scores, it may have increased individual-level measurement errors in adolescents. Conclusions: We observed no benefit of a breastfeeding promotion intervention on overall neurocognitive function. The only beneficial effect was on verbal function at age 16. The higher verbal ability is consistent with results observed at early school age; however, the effect size was substantially smaller in adolescence. ? 2018 Yang et al.
Source Title: PLoS Medicine
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/161884
ISSN: 15491277
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002554
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1371_journal_pmed_1002554.pdf2.17 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons