Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Screening for diabetes with HbA1c: Test performance of HbA1c compared to fasting plasma glucose among Chinese, Malay and Indian community residents in Singapore||Authors:||Lim W.-Y.
Loh Tze Ping
|Issue Date:||1-Dec-2018||Publisher:||Nature Publishing Group||Citation:||Lim W.-Y., Ma S., Heng D., Tai E.S., Khoo C.M., Loh Tze Ping (2018-12-01). Screening for diabetes with HbA1c: Test performance of HbA1c compared to fasting plasma glucose among Chinese, Malay and Indian community residents in Singapore. Scientific Reports 8 (1) : 12419. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29998-z||Abstract:||The prevalence of diabetes in Singapore is high. Screening to facilitate early detection and intervention has been shown to be cost-effective. Current clinical practice guidelines in Singapore recommend screening with fasting plasma glucose (FPG), followed by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in those with FPG 6.1-6.9 mmol/L. Glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) has robust stability at ambient temperature, and can be performed on non-fasted capillary blood samples, making it an attractive potential alternative for screening. However, limitations of HbA1c include differential performance in different races, and its performance as a screening test has not been well characterized in Asian populations. This study compares HbA1c and FPG as diabetes screening modalities in 3540 community-dwelling Singapore residents of Chinese, Malay and Indian race to detect diabetes mellitus diagnosed based on blood glucose (FPG ? 7.0 mmol/L, 2 hr OGTT ? 11.1 mmol/L). The area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) was higher for FPG compared to HbA1c in the overall population and age, race and age-race strata, but these differences were not statistically significant. HbA1c > = 7.0% identified 95% of individuals with diabetes mellitus, and the remainder had impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). HbA1c cut-off at 6.1% had better sensitivity (0.825) to FPG at 6.1 mmol/L. The positive predictive value of HbA1c at 6.1% was 40�% in different age-race combinations with a negative predictive value of about 98%. If follow-up screening with FPG is used, a lower cut-off at 5.6 mmol/L is appropriate in identifying people with pre-diabetes, as about 85% of people with HbA1c 6.1�9% and FPG 5.6�9 mmol/L had IFG/IGT or diabetes in the study sample. HbA1c is an appropriate alternative to FPG as a first-step screening test, and the combination of Hba1c > = 6.1% and FPG > = 5.6 mmol/L would improve the identification of individuals with diabetes mellitus and prediabetes. � 2018, The Author(s).||Source Title:||Scientific Reports||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/152065||ISSN:||2045-2322||DOI:||10.1038/s41598-018-29998-z|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
|s41598-018-29998-z.pdf||1.19 MB||Adobe PDF|
checked on Jul 18, 2019
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.