Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002518
Title: The prevalence and prognostic significance of right ventricular systolic dysfunction in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy
Authors: Gulati A.
Ismail T.F.
Jabbour A.
Alpendurada F.
Guha K.
Ismail N.A.
Raza S.
Khwaja J.
Brown T.D.H.
Morarji K.
Liodakis E.
Roughton M.
Wage R.
Pakrashi T.C.
Sharma R.
Carpenter J.-P.
Cook S.A. 
Cowie M.R.
Assomull R.G.
Pennell D.J.
Prasad S.K.
Keywords: Cardiomyopathies
Heart failure
Magnetic resonance imaging
Prognosis
Ventricular function, right
Issue Date: 2013
Citation: Gulati A., Ismail T.F., Jabbour A., Alpendurada F., Guha K., Ismail N.A., Raza S., Khwaja J., Brown T.D.H., Morarji K., Liodakis E., Roughton M., Wage R., Pakrashi T.C., Sharma R., Carpenter J.-P., Cook S.A., Cowie M.R., Assomull R.G., Pennell D.J., Prasad S.K. (2013). The prevalence and prognostic significance of right ventricular systolic dysfunction in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 128 (15) : 1623-1633. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002518
Abstract: BACKGROUND - Cardiovascular magnetic resonance is the gold-standard technique for the assessment of ventricular function. Although left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction are strong predictors of outcome in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), there are limited data regarding the prognostic significance of right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction (RVSD). We investigated whether cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of RV function has prognostic value in DCM. METHODS AND RESULTS - We prospectively studied 250 consecutive DCM patients with the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance. RVSD, defined by RV ejection fraction ó45%, was present in 86 (34%) patients. During a median follow-up period of 6.8 years, there were 52 deaths, and 7 patients underwent cardiac transplantation. The primary end point of all-cause mortality or cardiac transplantation was reached by 42 of 86 patients with RVSD and 17 of 164 patients without RVSD (49% versus 10%; hazard ratio, 5.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.35-10.37; P<0.001). On multivariable analysis, RVSD remained a significant independent predictor of the primary end point (hazard ratio, 3.90; 95% CI, 2.16-7.04; P<0.001), as well as secondary outcomes of cardiovascular mortality or cardiac transplantation (hazard ratio, 3.35; 95% CI, 1.76-6.39; P<0.001), and heart failure death, heart failure hospitalization, or cardiac transplantation (hazard ratio, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.32-5.51; P=0.006). Assessment of RVSD improved risk stratification for all-cause mortality or cardiac transplantation (net reclassification improvement, 0.31; 95% CI 0.10-0.53; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS - RVSD is a powerful, independent predictor of transplant-free survival and adverse heart failure outcomes in DCM. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of RV function is important in the evaluation and risk stratification of DCM patients. ? 2013 American Heart Association, Inc.
Source Title: Circulation
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/150857
ISSN: 97322
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002518
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002518.pdf694.11 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

126
checked on Jul 3, 2020

Page view(s)

97
checked on Jul 3, 2020

Download(s)

4
checked on Jul 3, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.