Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/133258
DC FieldValue
dc.titleOptimal dose of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming
dc.contributor.authorFong, Y.F.
dc.contributor.authorSingh, K.
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-19T06:48:46Z
dc.date.available2016-12-19T06:48:46Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.citationFong, Y.F., Singh, K. (1999). Optimal dose of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming. Contemporary Reviews in Obstetrics and Gynaecology 11 (4) : 297-301. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.issn09539182
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/133258
dc.description.abstractWorldwide, vacuum aspiration is the method of choice for terminating first-trimester unwanted pregnancies, but complications arising from forceful mechanical cervical dilatation prior to suction evacuation are an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality with first-trimester pregnancy termination. In order to minimize these risks, prostaglandins have been used to prime the cervix before vacuum aspiration. However logistics of storage and their high cost make such prostaglandin preparations beyond the reach of many health care systems. Misoprostol, a synthetic prostaglandin analogue, has been increasingly used in recent years for cervical priming prior to vacuum aspiration as it has the advantages of being cheap, easy to store and easy to use. With increasing use it is thus necessary to determine the optimal route, interval and dose for maximal efficacy. In a prospective double blind study, 120 women were assigned randomly to receive 200 400 600 or 800 μg of misoprostol vaginally. Vacuum aspiration was performed 3-4 h after insertion of the misoprostol. The results of this study show that the use of 400 μg of intravaginal misoprostol with an evacuation time interval of 3-4 h is the clinically optimal dose for pre-operative cervical priming before vacuum aspiration in first-trimester nulliparae, with minimal side effects and risks.
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentOBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY
dc.description.sourcetitleContemporary Reviews in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
dc.description.volume11
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.page297-301
dc.description.codenCROGE
dc.identifier.isiutNOT_IN_WOS
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Page view(s)

179
checked on Aug 16, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.