Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||On tomlin, and manning and parker on basic word order||Authors:||Song, J.J.||Issue Date:||1991||Citation:||Song, J.J. (1991). On tomlin, and manning and parker on basic word order. Language Sciences 13 (1) : 89-97. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.||Abstract:||In this article, two recent word order studies, i.e. Tomlin [Basic Word Order: Functional Principles, London: Croom Helm (1986)], and Manning and Parker [Language Sciences 11, 43-65 (1989)], will be examined. Some specific and general problems with these studies will be identified. Firstly, in Tomlin's study, the observed predominance of S initial languages is unaccounted for; to remedy this flaw, an alternative differential weighting system is proposed. Secondly, it is argued that Manning and Parker's (1989) figure/ground interpretation of basic word order is seriously problematic in that the support that they provide for the interpretation is both irrelevant and circular. In conclusion, non-linguistic evidence in the word order study is called for. © 1991.||Source Title:||Language Sciences||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/132350||ISSN:||03880001|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Jul 10, 2020
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.