Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412508009785
DC FieldValue
dc.titleHell and divine reasons for action
dc.contributor.authorSwan, K.
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-29T01:21:56Z
dc.date.available2016-11-29T01:21:56Z
dc.date.issued2009-03
dc.identifier.citationSwan, K. (2009-03). Hell and divine reasons for action. Religious Studies 45 (1) : 51-61. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412508009785
dc.identifier.issn00344125
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/131717
dc.description.abstractEscapism, a theory of hell proposed by Andrei Buckareff and Allen Plug, explicitly relies on claims about divine reasons for action. However, they say surprisingly little about the general account of reasons for action that would justify the inferences in the argument for escapism. I provide a couple of plausible interpretations of such an account and argue that they help revive the 'Job objection' to escapism that Buckareff and Plug had dismissed. © 2009 Cambridge University Press.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0034412508009785
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeReview
dc.contributor.departmentPHILOSOPHY
dc.description.doi10.1017/S0034412508009785
dc.description.sourcetitleReligious Studies
dc.description.volume45
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page51-61
dc.identifier.isiut000263802600004
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.