Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-006-1037-2
DC FieldValue
dc.titleExtraction of metastatic lymph nodes from MR images using two deformable model-based approaches
dc.contributor.authorZhou, J.-Y.
dc.contributor.authorFang, W.
dc.contributor.authorChan, K.-L.
dc.contributor.authorChong, V.F.H.
dc.contributor.authorKhoo, J.B.K.
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-29T01:20:28Z
dc.date.available2016-11-29T01:20:28Z
dc.date.issued2007-12
dc.identifier.citationZhou, J.-Y., Fang, W., Chan, K.-L., Chong, V.F.H., Khoo, J.B.K. (2007-12). Extraction of metastatic lymph nodes from MR images using two deformable model-based approaches. Journal of Digital Imaging 20 (4) : 336-346. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-006-1037-2
dc.identifier.issn08971889
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/131592
dc.description.abstractWe presented and evaluated two deformable model-based approaches, region plus contour deformation (RPCD), and level sets to extract metastatic cervical nodal lesions from pretreatment T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. The RPCD method first uses a region deformation to achieve a rough boundary of the target node from a manually drawn initial contour, based on signal statistics. After that, an active contour deformation is employed to drive the rough boundary to the real node-normal tissue interface. Differently, the level sets move a manually drawn initial contour toward the desired nodal boundary under the control of the evolvement speed function, which is influenced by image gradient force. The two methods were tested by extracting 33 metastatic cervical nodes from 18 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Experiments on a basis of pixel matching to reference standard showed that RPCD and level sets achieved averaged percentage matching at 82-84% and 87-88%, respectively. In addition, both methods had significantly lower interoperator variances than the manual tracing method. It was suggested these two methods could be useful tools for the evaluation of metastatic nodal volume as an indicator of classification and treatment response, or be alternatives for the delineation of metastatic nodal lesions in radiation treatment planning. © 2007 SCAR (Society for Computer Applications in Radiology).
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-006-1037-2
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDeformable model
dc.subjectLevel sets
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imaging
dc.subjectMetastatic cervical nodes
dc.subjectNasopharyngeal carcinoma
dc.subjectObject extraction
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY
dc.description.doi10.1007/s10278-006-1037-2
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Digital Imaging
dc.description.volume20
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.page336-346
dc.description.codenJDIME
dc.identifier.isiut000250206600003
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.