Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/130247
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | There Is No Best Method-Why? | |
dc.contributor.author | Prabhu, N.S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-11-16T11:03:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-11-16T11:03:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1990 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Prabhu, N.S. (1990). There Is No Best Method-Why?. TESOL Quarterly 24 (2) : 161-176. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 00398322 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/130247 | |
dc.description.abstract | The often-heard viewpoint that there is no one best method for language instruction is considered. The propositional context of this statement is emphasized, & an attempt is made to clarify the sense in which this statement can be viewed as accurate. Three arguments in support of this theory are proposed: (1) it depends on the teaching situation, (2) all methods have some validity, & (3) it is necessary to reconsider the term "best." It is concluded that instead of searching for a best method, it may be more helpful to look for ways in which teachers' & specialists' viewpoints can interact. J. Sihvola. | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.department | ENGLISH LANGUAGE & LITERATURE | |
dc.description.sourcetitle | TESOL Quarterly | |
dc.description.volume | 24 | |
dc.description.issue | 2 | |
dc.description.page | 161-176 | |
dc.description.coden | TESQA | |
dc.identifier.isiut | NOT_IN_WOS | |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.