Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/129408
DC FieldValue
dc.titleDescartes' dualism and contemporary dualism
dc.contributor.authorWee, C.
dc.contributor.authorPelczar, M.
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-08T08:22:17Z
dc.date.available2016-11-08T08:22:17Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationWee, C., Pelczar, M. (2008). Descartes' dualism and contemporary dualism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (1) : 145-160. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.issn00384283
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/129408
dc.description.abstractAfter drawing a distinction between two kinds of dualism - numerical dualism (defined in terms of identity) and modal dualism (defined in terms of supervenience) - we argue that Descartes is a numerical dualist, but not a modal dualist. Since most contemporary dualists advocate modal dualism, the relation of Descartes' views to the contemporary philosophy of mind are more complex than is commonly assumed.
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentPHILOSOPHY
dc.description.sourcetitleSouthern Journal of Philosophy
dc.description.volume46
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page145-160
dc.identifier.isiutNOT_IN_WOS
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Page view(s)

114
checked on Sep 23, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.