Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/127119
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | Assessing the performance of operating rooms: What to measure and why? | |
dc.contributor.author | Oh, H.C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Phua, T.B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Tong, S.C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lim, J.F.Y. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-09-07T08:58:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-09-07T08:58:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 20101058 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/127119 | |
dc.description.abstract | There are multiple indicators that measure different aspects of operating room (OR) performance such as OR productivity, satisfaction of patients and staff involved. The choice of these indicator(s) used for monitoring the performance of ORs often impacts how the processes of ORs are organised and managed. However, there is still no consensus in literature on which indicator(s) should be used for monitoring OR performance. In an effort to promote consensus within the healthcare community, this paper discusses potential performance metrics which may be employed for evaluation of ORs, their rationale and their limitations, and explains why a multidimensional approach is critical in assessment of OR performance. | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Operating theatre | |
dc.subject | Performance indicators | |
dc.subject | Productivity | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.department | EPIDEMIOLOGY & PUBLIC HEALTH | |
dc.description.sourcetitle | Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare | |
dc.description.volume | 20 | |
dc.description.issue | 2 | |
dc.description.page | 105-109 | |
dc.identifier.isiut | NOT_IN_WOS | |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.