Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Evidence-based guideline for the written radiology report: Methods, recommendations and implementation challenges
Authors: Goergen, S.K.
Pool, F.J. 
Turner, T.J.
Grimm, J.E.
Appleyard, M.N.
Crock, C.
Fahey, M.C.
Fay, M.F.
Ferris, N.J.
Liew, S.M.
Perry, R.D.
Revell, A.
Russell, G.M.
Wang, S.-C.S.C.
Wriedt, C.
Keywords: evidenced-based guideline
report template
structured reporting
Issue Date: Feb-2013
Citation: Goergen, S.K., Pool, F.J., Turner, T.J., Grimm, J.E., Appleyard, M.N., Crock, C., Fahey, M.C., Fay, M.F., Ferris, N.J., Liew, S.M., Perry, R.D., Revell, A., Russell, G.M., Wang, S.-C.S.C., Wriedt, C. (2013-02). Evidence-based guideline for the written radiology report: Methods, recommendations and implementation challenges. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology 57 (1) : 1-7. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Abstract: The written radiology report is the dominant method by which radiologists communicate the results of diagnostic and interventional imaging procedures. It has an important impact on decisions about further investigation and management. Its form and content can be influential in reducing harm to patients and mitigating risk for practitioners but varies markedly with little standardisation in practice. Until now, the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists has not had a guideline for the written report. International guidelines on this subject are not evidence based and lack description of development methods. The current guideline seeks to improve the quality of the written report by providing evidence-based recommendations for good practice. The following attributes of the report are addressed by recommendations: Content Clinical information available to the radiologist at the time the report was created Technical details of the procedure Examination quality and limitations Findings (both normal and abnormal) Comparison with previous studies Pathophysiological diagnosis Differential diagnoses Clinical correlation and/or answer to the clinical question Recommendations, particularly for further imaging and other investigations Conclusion/opinion/impression Format Length Format Language Confidence and certainty Clarity Readability Accuracy Communication of discrepancies between an original verbal or written report and the final report Proofreading/editing of own and trainee reports © 2012 The RANZCR®. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology © 2012 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.
Source Title: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
ISSN: 17549477
DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12014
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.