Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741826711425428
DC FieldValue
dc.titleShort-term effect of motivational interviewing on clinical and psychological outcomes and health-related quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation patients with poor motivation in Hong Kong: A randomized controlled trial
dc.contributor.authorChair, S.Y.
dc.contributor.authorChan, S.W.-C.
dc.contributor.authorThompson, D.R.
dc.contributor.authorLeung, K.-P.
dc.contributor.authorNg, S.K.-C.
dc.contributor.authorChoi, K.C.
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-08T09:28:19Z
dc.date.available2016-07-08T09:28:19Z
dc.date.issued2012-12
dc.identifier.citationChair, S.Y., Chan, S.W.-C., Thompson, D.R., Leung, K.-P., Ng, S.K.-C., Choi, K.C. (2012-12). Short-term effect of motivational interviewing on clinical and psychological outcomes and health-related quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation patients with poor motivation in Hong Kong: A randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology 19 (6) : 1383-1392. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741826711425428
dc.identifier.issn20474873
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/125533
dc.description.abstractBackground: Motivational interviewing (MI) is effective in promoting behavioural changes in patients with substance abuse and smoking. However, its effectiveness on health outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation patients is unclear. Design: A randomized controlled trial.Method: A total of 146 patients assessed as having poor motivation attended a cardiac rehabilitation programme from February 2008 to June 2010. Patients (n = 73) in the control group received usual care while those in the experimental group (n = 73) received usual care plus four sessions of MI, each lasting 30-45 min. Clinical and psychological outcomes and health-related quality of life were measured at baseline and 3 months after entering the programme. Descriptive statistics, independent t-test, Pearson Chi-squared test, and generalized estimating equations models were used to analyse the data.Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups on clinical outcomes (all p-values >0.05). Patients in the experimental group had higher increases in health-related quality of life (SF-36) scores in the aspects of general health (4.74, 95% CI 0.04-9.44; p = 0.048) and role limitation due to emotional problems (8.80, 95% CI 1.16-16.43; p = 0.024). However, they reported significantly higher increases in anxiety levels (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) than those in the control group (0.96, 95% CI 0.09-1.83; p = 0.030). Conclusion: The short-term effectiveness of MI on clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life in poorly motivated cardiac rehabilitation patients is limited. MI, however, was shown to increase anxiety levels of patients during the study period (3 months). More evidence is needed to better understand this phenomenon in the future studies. © 2011 The European Society of Cardiology.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1741826711425428
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCardiac rehabilitation
dc.subjectcoronary heart disease
dc.subjectmotivational interviewing
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentNURSING/ALICE LEE CTR FOR NURSING STUD
dc.description.doi10.1177/1741826711425428
dc.description.sourcetitleEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology
dc.description.volume19
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.page1383-1392
dc.identifier.isiut000314505600020
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

16
checked on Jan 27, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

11
checked on Jan 20, 2022

Page view(s)

182
checked on Jan 27, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.