Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215513490527
DC FieldValue
dc.titleLong-term effect of motivational interviewing on clinical and psychological outcomes and health-related quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation patients with poor motivation in Hong Kong: A randomized controlled trial
dc.contributor.authorChair, S.Y.
dc.contributor.authorChan, S.W.-C.
dc.contributor.authorThompson, D.R.
dc.contributor.authorLeung, K.-P.
dc.contributor.authorNg, S.K.-C.
dc.contributor.authorChoi, K.C.
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-08T09:28:17Z
dc.date.available2016-07-08T09:28:17Z
dc.date.issued2013-12
dc.identifier.citationChair, S.Y., Chan, S.W.-C., Thompson, D.R., Leung, K.-P., Ng, S.K.-C., Choi, K.C. (2013-12). Long-term effect of motivational interviewing on clinical and psychological outcomes and health-related quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation patients with poor motivation in Hong Kong: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 27 (12) : 1107-1117. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215513490527
dc.identifier.issn02692155
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/125530
dc.description.abstractObjective: To investigate the long-term effects of motivational interviewing on clinical outcomes, psychological outcomes, health-related quality of life among cardiac rehabilitation patients with poor motivation. Design: A randomized controlled trial with blind data collectors. Setting: Cardiac rehabilitation centre. Subjects: A total of 146 cardiac rehabilitation patients with poor motivation. Intervention: All participants received usual care, including exercise and education, while those in the experimental group also received 10 sessions of motivational interviewing, each lasting 3045 minutes. Main measures: Clinical and psychological outcomes and health-related quality of life were assessed at baseline and at six, nine and 12 months for both groups. Result: There was no significant difference between the two groups at baseline on demographic and clinical outcomes except for monthly family income (p = 0.034). Patients in the experimental group had higher increases in health-related quality of life (SF-36) scores in bodily pain (88.7 SD 16.7 vs. 87.6 SD 18.7 at month 12, p = 0.044) and role limitation owing to emotional problems (86.9 SD 19.2 vs. 78.6 SD 21.8 at month 9, p = 0.019; 85.8 SD 18.9 vs. 76.9 SD 23.9 at month 12, p = 0.022). No statistically significant group difference was found among other outcomes. Conclusion: The long-term effect of motivational interviewing on clinical and psychological outcomes and health-related quality of life in studied patients is limited. © 2013 The Author(s).
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215513490527
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCardiac rehabilitation
dc.subjectcoronary heart disease
dc.subjectmotivational interviewing
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentNURSING/ALICE LEE CTR FOR NURSING STUD
dc.description.doi10.1177/0269215513490527
dc.description.sourcetitleClinical Rehabilitation
dc.description.volume27
dc.description.issue12
dc.description.page1107-1117
dc.description.codenCEHAE
dc.identifier.isiut000329490000005
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
checked on Nov 8, 2019

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
checked on Nov 1, 2019

Page view(s)

64
checked on Nov 8, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.