Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1097/IPC.0b013e31824f8acb
DC FieldValue
dc.titleInternational approaches to treating intravenous drug users in outpatient parenteral antibiotic services
dc.contributor.authorHo, J.
dc.contributor.authorArchuleta, S.
dc.contributor.authorTice, A.
dc.contributor.authorFisher, D.
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-08T09:26:40Z
dc.date.available2016-07-08T09:26:40Z
dc.date.issued2012-05
dc.identifier.citationHo, J.,Archuleta, S.,Tice, A.,Fisher, D. (2012-05). International approaches to treating intravenous drug users in outpatient parenteral antibiotic services. Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice 20 (3) : 192-195. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1097/IPC.0b013e31824f8acb" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1097/IPC.0b013e31824f8acb</a>
dc.identifier.issn10569103
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/125408
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: The use of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) in intravenous drug-using (IVDU) patients remains controversial. It is currently unknown what the approaches and outcomes are of treating IVDU patients in OPAT services from around the world. We conducted an international survey to gain a better understanding of this issue. METHODS: A survey was conducted using an online survey program from May to October 2010 to OPAT centers from around the world. This survey addressed a range of issues including the following: the approach of health institutions on the treatment of IVDU patients requiring prolonged parenteral antibiotics, the outcomes of IVDU patients treated with OPAT, and the providers' concerns and views on this form of therapy. The results were collated as a whole and also divided into geographical groups to compare responses internationally. RESULTS: Sixty-four OPAT centers from Australia, New Zealand, Asia, North America, United Kingdom, and Europe participated in this survey. Most of the responding centers (84.4%) stated they treat patients with a history of IVDU, and a significant proportion (44.2%) use peripherally inserted central catheters. Despite some concerns, most responders (84%) believe that the use of OPAT in IVDU patients is beneficial and outweighs the risks with little interregional variation in this approach and opinion. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some limitations to survey distribution, we feel that these findings are important and unique. They show that, around the world, OPAT centers are treating IVDU patients with acceptable outcomes. Moreover, this form of therapy is increasingly regarded as a beneficial and a preferred treatment option in this significant group of patients. Copyright © 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IPC.0b013e31824f8acb
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjecthospital in the home
dc.subjectinternational
dc.subjectoutpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy
dc.subjectsurvey
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentMEDICINE
dc.description.doi10.1097/IPC.0b013e31824f8acb
dc.description.sourcetitleInfectious Diseases in Clinical Practice
dc.description.volume20
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.page192-195
dc.description.codenIDCPE
dc.identifier.isiutNOT_IN_WOS
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Jun 25, 2022

Page view(s)

104
checked on Jun 23, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.