Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Comparison of forecasting methods with an application to predicting excess equity premium||Authors:||Hsiao, C.
|Keywords:||Forecast combination||Issue Date:||Mar-2011||Citation:||Hsiao, C., Wan, S.K. (2011-03). Comparison of forecasting methods with an application to predicting excess equity premium. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 81 (7) : 1235-1246. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2010.03.010||Abstract:||This paper reviews various forecast methods including combination using theoretically optimal weights and those under model selection approaches. In addition, we suggest two modified simple averaging forecast combination methods - a mean corrected and a mean and scale corrected method. We conclude that due to the fact that real data is usually subject to structural breaks, rolling forecasting scheme has a better performance than fixed window and continuously updating scheme. In addition, methods that use less information appear to perform better than methods using all the sample information about the covariance structure of the available forecasts. The mean and scale corrected simple average approach yield smaller mean squared forecast error than the three widely used regression approaches suggested by Granger and Ramanathan . © 2010 IMACS. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.||Source Title:||Mathematics and Computers in Simulation||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/124966||ISSN:||03784754||DOI:||10.1016/j.matcom.2010.03.010|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Jan 18, 2022
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Jan 10, 2022
checked on Jan 20, 2022
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.