Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.103201cl
DC FieldValue
dc.titleNuclear reprogramming in zygotes
dc.contributor.authorLorthongpanich, C.
dc.contributor.authorSolter, D.
dc.contributor.authorLim, C.Y.
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-01T10:32:40Z
dc.date.available2016-06-01T10:32:40Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationLorthongpanich, C., Solter, D., Lim, C.Y. (2011). Nuclear reprogramming in zygotes. International Journal of Developmental Biology 54 (11-12) : 1631-1640. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.103201cl
dc.identifier.issn02146282
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/124873
dc.description.abstractNuclear reprogramming, the conversion of the epigenome of a differentiated cell to one that is similar to the undifferentiated embryonic state, can be facilitated by several methods, such as nuclear transfer, cell fusion, use of embryonic stem cell extracts, and more recently, by the introduction of exogenous transcription factors. Amongst these various strategies, somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is, by far, the most effective method of nuclear reprogramming. The majority of SCNT studies have been carried out using enucleated mature oocytes, as reprogramming is efficient and can be completed within hours following the introduction of the somatic cell nuclei into the recipient oocyte. Fertilized eggs, on the other hand, were regarded as poor recipients for nuclear transfer, as previous studies showed that embryonic blastomeres transferred into enucleated zygotes were unable to develop to blastocysts. However, more recent studies have demonstrated that the method of enucleation and the cell cycle phase of the embryos can impact the success of somatic cell reprogramming when zygotes were used as nuclear recipients. It is, therefore, timely to revisit and further explore the nuclear reprogramming capacity of zygotes as recipients for SCNT. Assessment of the various factors that influence the reprogramming capacity of zygotes in SCNT also provide hints of the mechanistic nature of nuclear reprogramming. © 2010 UBC Press.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.103201cl
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectEmbryo
dc.subjectNuclear transfer
dc.subjectReprogramming
dc.subjectSCNT
dc.subjectZygote
dc.typeReview
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS GRADUATE MEDICAL SCHOOL S'PORE
dc.description.doi10.1387/ijdb.103201cl
dc.description.sourcetitleInternational Journal of Developmental Biology
dc.description.volume54
dc.description.issue11-12
dc.description.page1631-1640
dc.description.codenIJDBE
dc.identifier.isiut000291961200009
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
checked on Nov 30, 2021

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

11
checked on Nov 22, 2021

Page view(s)

85
checked on Dec 2, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.