Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2011.560026
Title: Depictive structure?
Authors: Blumson, B. 
Issue Date: Mar-2011
Citation: Blumson, B. (2011-03). Depictive structure?. Philosophical Papers 40 (1) : 1-25. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2011.560026
Abstract: This paper argues against definitions of depiction in terms of the syntactic and semantic properties of symbol systems. In particular, it is argued that John Kulvicki's definition of depictive symbol systems in terms of relative repleteness, semantic richness, syntactic sensitivity and transparency is susceptible to similar counterexamples as Nelson Goodman's in terms of syntactic density, semantic density and relative repleteness. The general moral drawn is that defining depiction requires attention not merely to descriptive questions about syntax and semantics, but also to foundational questions about what makes it the case that depictions have the syntactic and semantic properties they do. © 2011 The Editorial Board, Philosophical Papers.
Source Title: Philosophical Papers
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/124465
ISSN: 05568641
DOI: 10.1080/05568641.2011.560026
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Jul 5, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
checked on Jul 5, 2022

Page view(s)

145
checked on Jun 23, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.