Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||A comment on "The way of the dialetheist: Contradictions in Buddhism," by Yasuo Deguchi, Jay L. Garfield, and Graham Priest||Authors:||Ziporyn, B.||Issue Date:||Jul-2013||Citation:||Ziporyn, B. (2013-07). A comment on "The way of the dialetheist: Contradictions in Buddhism," by Yasuo Deguchi, Jay L. Garfield, and Graham Priest. Philosophy East and West 63 (3) : 344-352. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2013.0026||Abstract:||Offering a response here based in the Three Truths tradition of Tiantai Buddhism as opposed to the Two Truths epistemologies of Indian Mahayana, Huayan, and Chan, the claim is rejected that "true" and " liberating" have different denotations, such that there is a kind of truth that is not in some way liberating. The model for truth in Buddhism, as understood in Tiantai, is the raft, expanded into the concept of upāya. Tiantai claims that it is not only some statements that are self-contradictory, nor is it only some self-contradictory statements that are true, nor only some true statements that are potentially liberating; rather, all statements are self-contradictory, and thus are potentially liberating, and it is for this reason and this reason alone that they are all true. © 2013 by University of Hawai'i Press.||Source Title:||Philosophy East and West||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/124463||ISSN:||00318221||DOI:||10.1353/pew.2013.0026|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Sep 18, 2019
checked on Sep 6, 2019
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.